2019 Range Rover Offers Up a Shiny British Bauble for Environmentalists

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Whenever I see a Range Rover — the true Range Rover — I always assume there’s someone connected to the music industry behind the wheel. Just like Lambos and hockey players, we associate a type of person with a type of vehicle. And, given its origin as a vehicle designed to crush vegetation beneath its wheels while coddling its occupants with the supple hide of dead livestock, “environmentalist” is not the persona we associate with Land Rover’s Range Rover stable.

We’ll have to change our assumptions. For 2019, Range Rover’s glitziest nameplate adds a plug-in hybrid variant, allowing drivers to spew zero tailpipe emissions while taming nature in classic Victorian fashion.

Called the Range Rover P400e, Jaguar Land Rover’s newest electrified model offers 31 miles of all-electric driving via its 114-horsepower electric motor, juiced by a 13.1 kWh lithium-ion battery.

As the pinnacle of the model line, Range Rovers don’t come cheap, nor do they come spartan. Buyers can expect a heavy dose of luxury to back up their newfound green cred, but the P400e’s MSRP remains in the five-figure zone. Positioned between the HSE and HSE Td6 (fourth from bottom on the Range Rover totem pole), the P400e stickers for $95,150 and holds the distinction of being the only Range Rover with four-cylinder power. No long-wheelbase variant, sorry.

The mill is a turbocharged 2.0-liter Ingenium four-cylinder, making 296 horsepower. Total system output is 398 hp and 472 lb-ft of torque, channelled to all four wheels through an eight-speed automatic transmission. Sprints to 60 mph shouldn’t take more than 6.4 seconds, JLR claims.

While the Range Rover PHEV offers natty options (Hot Stone massage and front console chiller, anyone?) and a long list of sumptuous standard features, those shouldn’t be a mystery to those familiar with the automaker’s trappings. The few changes for 2019, besides the new PHEV model, include Wade Sensing (real-time info on the depth of the liquid you’re fording) and available Active Cruise Control system with Steering Assist.

Would-be buyers of the P400e are likely more interested in the powertrain — and the ability to select electric power when you want it.

The P400e’s default setting sees the vehicle driven as a conventional parallel hybrid, but drivers can also choose EV mode for gas-free motoring until the battery runs out. However, depending on the nature of your trip, selecting the “Save” function might be best. This mode keeps the battery’s capacity in reserve, with the vehicle driving solely under internal combustion power until the driver chooses to deploy EV mode — like in urban driving, for example. This mode also allows regenerative braking and coasting to top up the battery to full after driving in hybrid mode.

You’ll find the charging socket behind the Land Rover badge on the right side of the grille. The automaker claims a 2 hour, 45 minute charging time using a 220V/32 Amp dedicated charger. There’s also a home charging cord on board for those times when you only have access to a conventional wall outlet.

Given the status-symbol nature of Range Rovers, it’s hard to picture this vehicle performing anything other than freeway and around-town driving. Still, the automaker plays up the powertrain’s ability to deliver gobs of torque to each wheel from a standstill, touting its “superior pull-away” abilities on soft surfaces.

“The low range transmission can also be operated in pure EV mode; bringing luxurious refinement to all-terrain journeys,” it states. “The Land Rover Terrain Response 2 technology is also able to distribute torque from the electric motor – which has no creep speed and maximum torque from zero rpm – to all four wheels.”

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 6 comments
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Aug 07, 2018

    Dang that picture really strikes me as looking like a Ford Flex, must be the angle or something because I've never had that thought about Range Rover.

    • See 2 previous
    • RHD RHD on Aug 08, 2018

      It does, except that the Ford Flex doesn't have shark gills on the sides.

  • Ernest Ernest on Aug 07, 2018

    I can think of a few garages in my neighborhood where that RR will look great parked next to Tesla S.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next