Infiniti Unveils New 'Prototype' Concept at Pebble Beach

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Last summer, Infiniti revealed an open-wheeled racer that merged the sex appeal of yesteryear with the electric powertrain of tomorrow. It was called the the Prototype 9 and it was stunningly beautiful. This summer, the brand attempted to repeat that success with the Prototype 10.

While the vintage maxim of “lightning never strikes the same place twice” isn’t scientifically accurate, it’s applicable here. Unveiled at this year’s Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance, the Prototype 10 is a rehash. It’s another reimagining of mid-century racing, bestowed with an electric motor and some modern flair.

It’s an incredibly handsome automobile, but unnecessary, as it’s representative of absolutely nothing. Infiniti isn’t planning on building single-seat race cars and doesn’t appear prepared to jump into the mass assembly of high-performance EVs. This has been a problem with Infiniti for a while now. The company embraces forward-looking and completely fantastical concept vehicles at the expense of something that might enter into production within a few years. Ultimately, it feels like a wasted effort.

Before everyone points a finger our way and shouts that we’re engaging in hypocrisy for liking the Prototype 9 so much, allow us an opportunity to defend ourselves. Infiniti went to a lot of effort to explain the concept behind the car. While it may have only used the motor from the Nissan Leaf, it was ludicrously lightweight and appeared to have some seriously committed folks behind it. Infiniti hammered body panels into shape for hours and Infiniti made us believe it was a passion project for its staff. They wanted to do a garage build that merged old school-charm with new-school hardware. It wasn’t going to become a production model, but it at least felt authentic and showcased an overwhelming enthusiasm coming from the brand.

In addition to being too similar in concept, this is what the Prototype 10 lacks. Infiniti hasn’t even specified what would power the model. All we know is that, assuming something actually lurks beneath the sheetmetal, it doesn’t use liquid fuel. According to the automaker, the car previews the company’s electric car intentions as well as future design and styling cues. But where is one supposed to look for that?

While the overall shape is hugely pleasant, there are barely any details to draw from. Head and tail lamps are razor-thin slits, there’s no grille, and the only patterning that is transferable to a production car are the vertical slats appearing behind the driver’s seat (as electric motor cooling ducts). Unless these make their way to the front of subsequent vehicles — or they adopt the Prototype 10’s pointed nose, concave door panels, and rounded tail — there’s really nothing to see here.

The Q Inspiration Concept, unveiled in January, does have a few overlapping design elements. But Infiniti already confirmed it won’t ever see production. Instead, a new electrified vehicle platform “inspired by” it will launch sometime within the next five years.

After so many concept vehicles that seem incapable of gracing an assembly line, we’re left wondering if Infiniti’s design team is simply looking too far ahead, or if it has become bankrupt of executable ideas. We like a fantasy car just as much as the next enthusiast, but the Prototype 10, despite its attractive exterior, is redundant and wildly unrealistic.

If the brand has an electrified rework of a Porsche 962 or some other vintage racer in mind for the Prototype 11, we urge them to stop now. We don’t need another concept like this for a while.

You’ve done some beautiful work here, Infiniti. But it’s time to move on to something else.

[Images: Infiniti]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Aug 24, 2018

    That's more than enough intake real estate for a turbocharged Cosworth DFV in the back - slightly offset to balance out the driver. If wishes were horses, etc.

  • Thornmark Thornmark on Aug 25, 2018

    Nissan does fugly. Is that news.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next