The Fallout: Asinine Suggestions and Legitimate Pain Greet GM's Announcement

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

But first, some Cyber Monday deals…!

Just kidding. Hopefully we’ve seen the last of that, God willing.

It didn’t take long for the usual suspects north of the border to respond to General Motors’ looming plant closures with ridiculous “solutions” — nationalizing GM Canada, for example, no doubt with the goal of repeating the successes of British Leyland in the late 70s and early 80s. Who could doubt the profit-generating prowess of the public sector?

Elsewhere, fiery rhetoric from autoworkers’ unions greeted news of GM’s plan to shutter five plants in the U.S. and Canada. But without new product allocations, and with demand for traditional sedans sinking fast, there’s little hope of seeing these facilities return to their golden days.

CEO Mary Barra defended the plan to stop production at the plants and discontinue a raft of models next year, claiming the move, coupled with other cost-saving initiatives, would protect GM from an eventual economic downturn. It would also free up development cash now, rather than threaten its existence down the line.

“This is what we’re doing to transform the company. The industry is changing very rapidly,” Barra said in a news conference attended by The Wall Street Journal. “We think it’s appropriate to get in front of it while the business and the economy are strong.”

She added, “We don’t see anything specific on the horizon. This is about making sure GM is lean and agile to get in front and lead in autonomous and electric vehicles.”

In total, 14,800 GM employees might end up leaving the company under the current streamlining efforts. Some 8,000 of them would be in North America — a loss of 15 percent of the automaker’s North American salaried workforce — with the company accomplishing its goal through layoffs, retirements, or buyouts. For the consumer, the potential loss of Oshawa Assembly, Detroit-Hamtramck, and Lordstown Assembly, plus a Michigan and Maryland transmission plant, would mean pretty much the end of the GM car as we know it.

Built at the three aforementioned plants are the Chevrolet Cruze, Impala, and Volt, the Cadillac CT6 and XTS, and Buick LaCrosse. Barra said that the loss of production would lead to the discontinuation of the models in North America. Meanwhile, ther Chevrolet Sonic, built at Michigan’s Orion Assembly, is living on borrowed time, as is the tiny Spark, which hails from GM Korea. That leaves the Chevrolet Camaro, Corvette, and Malibu, the upcoming Cadillac CT5, and the current Buick Regal to satisfy traditional car buyers.

True, GM workers wouldn’t find themselves in this situation if consumer tastes hadn’t migrated to light trucks. Through the end of September, year-to-date sales of the XTS (a livery favorite) rose 15.9 percent, but it was nowhere but down for other models slated for execution. U.S. sales of the CT6 fell 10.6 percent, year to date, while the Cruze dropped 26.5 percent, the Impala 13.4 percent, and the Volt 13.7 percent. Buick’s full-size LaCrosse, which has shed buyers for years, completed the first three quarters of the year with 14.2 percent fewer sales.

According to the Associated Press, LaCrosse, Volt, and U.S.-market Cruze production will wrap up March 1st, 2019, with CT6 and Impala production ending June 1st. The Warren plant, maker of six-speed transmissions, would go dark on August 1st, with Baltimore’s plant ceasing work on April 1st.

While there’s a chance the plants might be put to a different future use, the products built within seem destined for the grave. In the U.S., United Auto Workers representatives called the move “callous,” vowing to fight the decision via legal, contractual, and collective bargaining means. North of the border, Unifor president Jerry Dias said he’ll be “very aggressive and very aggressive soon” on GM, with the Detroit Three autoworkers’ union claiming it plans to meet with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

What good that will do remains to be seen. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, after speaking to the head of GM Sunday, said “the ship has already left the dock.” Oshawa Assembly, which has produced vehicles since before Chevrolet was even part of GM, will turn out the lights at the end of the year.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 101 comments
  • DonInYYC DonInYYC on Nov 27, 2018

    Oh oh, I have an idea....let's sell the plant to Hyundai. Worked well in Quebec in the seventies. What could possibly go wrong? The Pony was simply a generation ahead of its time.

  • DavesNotHere DavesNotHere on Nov 27, 2018

    There's Chevy's new ad campaign: Real People, Real Urinal Cakes™

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next