2019 Lexus LX570 - Deep Within the Garden

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2019 Lexus LX570

5.7-liter V8 DOHC (383 hp @ 5600 rpm, 403 lb/ft. @ 3600 rpm)
Eight-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
13 city / 18 highway / 15 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
14.1 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price
$86,855 US
As Tested
$88,195 US
Prices include $1,025 destination charge in the United States. (2-row LX not available in Canada)

In the beginning, Willys created the sports-utility vehicle. Now, the sports was negligible and the utility was strictly for the military-industrial complex, and darkness was over two continents at war. And when the war ended, Willys said “let there be civilians who want to drink cheap beer and go rock crawling,” and there were knobby tires and lift kits.

Then the off-roaders began to multiply, each taking their own form. And it was good. But then one saw that the fruit of a tree in the garden looked like a half-used bar of soap — this tree, known as the crossover, represents all that is evil.

Lexus has embraced everything within the realm of the sports-utility spectrum. From tiny crossovers to this massive 2019 Lexus LX570, nearly all needs can be covered. But is this biggest Lexus good or evil?

Yes, it’s functionally a Toyota Land Cruiser with Lexus touches. The Land Cruiser, legendary as an indestructible, go-anywhere people-and-stuff carrier, has long been the flagship of Toyota’s lineup. Within Lexus, however, the LX570 seems an afterthought — and interestingly, the two vehicles aren’t that far apart in price.

This is probably the worst appearance of Lexus’ predator grille. When applied to a truck of this size, it looks like it can eat small children. Beyond that and the blocky tail, it’s a benign looking beast, but I can’t get past that horrifying grille.

The interior works well — mercifully, the LX uses an up-to-date version of the Lexus infotainment system, which, while by no means perfect, is much better than the clunky touchscreen used on the baby brother GX I tested last fall. I’m still not a fan of the mouse-style control for most audio and navigation functions, but it’s miles better than the older system.

Seating front and rear is perfectly comfortable. I’m a bit surprised that this LX570 is available with the option of either two or three rows of seats — the two rows on my tester make for a cavernous luggage compartment, swallowing everything I could toss while asking for more.

With so much mass grounding the LX to the ground, you’d think it’d be an incredible highway cruiser. And while the ride is sublime, the steering requires a great deal of correction to maintain a lane on anything but glass-smooth tarmac. Plus, the mileage is not good. Sure, you’re moving 5800 pounds with a 383-hp V8, so you wouldn’t expect Prius-level efficiency, but my drive time included more highway time than I usually encounter. Rather than approaching the EPA highway estimate, I barely met the city numbers with a 14.1-mpg average.

Honestly, I’d love to see some of the hybrid technology that Toyota/Lexus have perfected trickle up to their larger vehicles. I’d have to believe that a significant impact could be made if the LX, GX, Tundra, and Land Cruiser had some electrons moving their mass.

I’m struggling to picture the market for the LX570. Perhaps this will attract an owner who needs the cachet of a luxury marque at the country club or at the office yet needs to haul a horse trailer or a boat on weekends. But none of these functions focus on the core excellence of the Land Cruiser platform within — off-road superiority. The light, vague steering that helps whilst rock crawling makes interstate drives more of a chore than needed.

Oddly, the LX570 can tow 7000 pounds, while the very similar Land Cruiser is rated at 8100 pounds. 1100 pounds doesn’t sound like much, but it can make a difference if you’re looking at travel trailers, enclosed race trailers, or a longer boat.

For the off-road fanatics, check out the suspension articulation at the, ahem, off-road park — better known as a mostly abandoned shopping mall.

I’m sure there are a few crazies out there who will happily wheel their $88,195 luxury SUV out in the wilderness, and for those, I’m certain that you’ll be satisfied. The only true sin I found is gluttony — it’s so thirsty! But, you say, first cast out the beam of thine own eye, and you’re right. I’m afraid that my brief foray in mall crawling is a more realistic representation of the life of a Lexus LX, and for this, it is less than ideal.

[Images: © 2019 Chris Tonn]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 84 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jul 09, 2019

    Give the difference in price between the LC and the 570 - I don't know why anyone would buy the LC. The Lexus dealer experience is worth the difference on its own and when you're paying this much money for a vehicle, another $5K to $10K (or the difference in lease payment) isn't all that much.

  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Jul 09, 2019

    "I barely met the city numbers with a 14.1-mpg average." What a joke, I had 3000 lbs of boat behind my 2007 'Hoe running in "3" last weekend and I got that mileage. The exterior styling is an absolute mess. Cohesive & well proportioned it's not. Who would spend $90K to drive something this ugly & underpowered???? Just get a Yukon Denail w/6.2 and drive a real truck.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next