Video: Tesla Slams Into Overturned Truck in Probable Autopilot Failure

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

A Tesla Model 3 became one with an overturned box truck in Taiwan on Monday, raising another red flag for advanced driver-assist features. Since we routinely crap upon driving aids — which never seem to work when and how you need them — we’ll keep this one under 650 words. Fortunately, our task has been made easier by preliminary reports lacking much information and a sizable language barrier.

The incident took place on Taiwan’s National Highway 1 near the Zhongshan High Chiayi Water Section, with the car allegedly operating in Autopilot mode. Video footage shows the Model 3 keeping to the leftmost lane with ample time to stop for the overturned delivery vehicle. There’s even a person standing in the road (likely the truck’s driver), flagging cars to warn them of the giant obstacle. The Tesla, however, failed to notice any of that until it was too late and ended up going through the trailer’s roof.

As much blame as the manufacturer is bound to get for this one (like in past incidents), we’re saddling the driver with all the responsibility this time. There’s really no excuse for this to have happened, assuming the vehicle’s brakes were functioning normally, and the accident could have been avoided if he’d kept his eyes on the road. It also feels fine to call him a moron, as he survived the encounter without sustaining serious injuries.

The Model 3 does appear to apply the brakes as it approaches the overturned vehicle, but it’s far too late to do anything but bleed off some speed before impact. Jalopnik, which first reported the story in English, did not indicate whether Autopilot or the driver (a 53-year-old man named Huang) stomped the brake pedal at the last second. Local Taiwanese outlets seem to suggest it was the car. Had his overconfidence in Autopilot not gotten him into the predicament in the first place, we’d probably praise the system. That won’t happen today.

Tesla’s Autopilot has shown itself to be vulnerable to large, brightly colored objects (usually white). Joshua Brown, the Florida Tesla owner believed to be the first Autopilot-related fatality, also collided with a white semi-truck trailer that the system’s camera array failed to recognize as an obstacle. LIDAR, which CEO Elon Musk has been famously averse to implementing, probably would have been able to fill in some of the visual gaps in the software. But don’t assume it’d have saved the day. We’ve driven enough advanced driving aids to know they’re always one minor hiccup away from failing you, regardless of manufacturer or design.

Twitter user @jsin86524368, who clearly has an axe to grind with overhyped automotive tech (we see you, brother) and an affinity for comically cringeworthy articles/press releases, compiled a comprehensive collection of photos and videos from the incident. He also said that Taiwanese media claimed the car’s airbags didn’t go off. While the accident may not have been severe enough to trigger them, the footage certainly makes it seem as though they should have.

Tesla rarely has anything to say about stuff like this unless it’s forced to; in this case, we don’t think there’s much of a need. The problem is fairly obvious. Misleading marketing has led well-heeled fools to believe certain automotive products are self-driving and they’re now running amok on public roads.

Our take? Regulators need to pull their heads out of their asses and come to grips with how badly they’ve mishandled certifying this “life-saving technology” and remind themselves that corporate promises don’t mean a whole lot. At the same time, automakers (not just Tesla) need to cut the crap and stop pretending driver assistance packages are infallible. They’re notoriously unreliable, frequently obnoxious, and selling them has allowed a subset of bad drivers to become worse because they’ve mistakenly convinced themselves that an electronic nanny will intervene at the last minute and save them.

https://twitter.com/jsin86524368/status/1267423319495606272

[Image: B.Zhou/Shuterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 32 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jun 02, 2020

    Speculation (we've seen my history of video interpretation - lol): • The driver of the truck (if that's the driver of the truck) likely saved this guy - the driver of the car brakes when the driver of the truck gets in his face as much as possible at that speed. • The driver of the car did eventually bleed off a good bit of speed - it's interesting that the airbags didn't fire [likely Delta-V hint]. • +1 to indi500fan's 'crash dissipation' comment. The driver of the car certainly chose the 'softest' part of the truck to run into. The front end of the Tesla looks to be in pretty good shape. Latest death statistics [worldwide] (from people who have a financial incentive to track them carefully): https://www.tesladeaths.com/ Nobody died here, so of course you don't see this one listed. [If looking for this incident in the spreadsheet was your first instinct, check your biases.] In the "Autopilot claimed" column, the latest figure is from September 17, 2019. In the "Verified Tesla Autopilot Death" column, the latest entry is from March 1, 2019. If you graph global "Verified Tesla Autopilot Death"s over time, you get a very different picture than the reactionary knee-jerk hysteria some have exhibited. Meanwhile, it *may be possible* that Tesla 'Autopilot' [thumbs-down on naming] has prevented some accidents and some deaths.

  • Imagefont Imagefont on Jun 02, 2020

    All the Tesla fanboys.... jeez Once again and pay attention: this system is specifically designed to lull the driver into a false sense of security, even if the fine print says is sub level 2. The system WILL DRIVE THE CAR, about as competently as a five year old either one driving lesson. When it works all the fanboys point to he great tech a mumble something about statistics and how that proves it’s safe. When there’s a crash, blame the driver, you should have been paying attention, don’t blame the car. Do you get it? Anyone with functioning brain cells out there? Anyone? No???

    • See 4 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 03, 2020

      @Vulpine I'm not in the industry, but an airbag is somewhere between an active and passive device. It doesn't control the steering, throttle, or brakes like AP does. It merely sits there waiting for a signal to deploy. Airbags aren't as passive as a seatbelt, but even those require the driver to use them, and some are fitted with 'active' retraction devices for high-G crashes. If you're referring to Takata, that's clearly an anomaly in passenger safety. Nothing provides greater value than a seatbelt and a defensive driving style.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next