Rare Rides: A 1992 Lexus LS 400 in As-new Condition

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Rare Rides featured its first Lexus recently, the SC 400 which stood as the brand’s first coupe offering. Today we’ll check out the more important flagship of the Lexus brand upon its introduction in the early Nineties: the LS 400.

Toyota knew it was go big or go home when it came to a luxury offering in the North American market. Its only premium type cars on offer previously were the Corona, and its replacement the Cressida. The Cressida was dated, too slow, not large enough, and not luxurious enough for North American consumer tastes. At home, Toyota offered the Crown and the Century, but those large sedans were also conservative and focused on the demands of the upper-crust Japanese customer (a consumer who was loyal to a domestic car).

In entering the North American market, Toyota would have to pitch its luxury brand to a consumer base not accustomed to thinking of Japanese cars as luxurious; a consumer base that typically bought its luxury cars from established domestic players or the Europeans. Cognizant of the ask ahead Toyota started the development of the LS in 1983, as a super-secret project called F1. The F1 was intended for export, a product not directly for a Japanese audience.

The F1 took five years in development, and cost over $1 billion when all was said and done. The car that resulted was an all-new vehicle with a new V8. Toyota paid special attention to things European luxury sedans had, like a quiet cabin, the ability to tour at high speed, and effective aerodynamics.

The new brand to market the F1 was created in 1986 and called Lexus, and the large sedan the company would sell called the LS. By May 1987 all designs were frozen in place. The production version LS did not share parts with other Toyota vehicles, nor a platform. Its new 32-valve 1UZ-FE V8 was 4.0 liters in displacement, and good for 250 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque: Impressive figures at a time when German V8 engines produced around 200 horses. Its suspension was modern, an independent double-wishbone design. There was an air suspension as an optional extra. The design was quieter inside than either flagship offering from BMW or Mercedes-Benz, with a higher top speed, lower coefficient of drag, and lower curb weight.

Crucially in contrast to European and American competition, most features on the LS were standard. Said expansive standard features combined with a low base price of $35,000 to draw in customers. The base price was thousands cheaper than European competition but came with a disclaimer. $35,000 was the ask for an LS with cloth seats, a version with very limited availability that most dealers didn’t stock. Lexus’ main concern at the outset was keeping quality high and pricing low to make up a lack of brand heritage, and thus no snob appeal to the BMW-Jag golfing type customer. Chris Goffey did a nice comparison review on Ye Olde Top Gear back in the day. The LS stood out starkly for its standard equipment against Euro competition in the UK, which often didn’t offer air conditioning, a catalytic converter, or eight cylinders for a comparable price in 1990.

The plan worked, and the LS was an instant sales success which cemented the brand as an outlet of quality and reliable luxury in the eyes of consumers. The initial LS remained on sale through 1992, as a refresh debuted in 1993 in response to customer and dealer commentary. Said revised LS remained on sale through 1994, at which point a second generation arrived for 1995. Gen two was larger, more powerful, and more Avalon-ish looking (I really like the refreshed ’98 to ’00 look below). You probably know the rest.

Today’s Rare Ride is for sale in the hamlet of Orange County, near downtown California. With 22,000 miles since new, it’s in spectacular condition with California-appropriate gold badging and grille surround. The seller asks all the money for this rare condition LS: $23,000.

[Images: Lexus]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 51 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 22, 2021

    My best friend had a Cressida in the late 80s and after 100s of thousands of miles you could not kill it. For its time it was a great luxury car and relatively dependable if you did the required maintenance. Sure this Lexus is nicer but the Cressida was a very nice car.

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Apr 22, 2021

    When I first clicked the headline I half looked at the title and thought it was Murliee article. But then I was like, LS400 in junkyard? Unpossible.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next