Rare Rides: Bertone by Any Other Name, the 1979 Volvo 262C

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride is an example of the first time Bertone added heaps of Italian build quality to an ordinary Volvo midsize. We’ve covered Bertone’s second effort ( the 780) long ago, so it’s past time we talk 262C.

Though Volvo fancies itself upscale today, the company was not a luxury manufacturer in the Seventies. The Swedish purveyor of boxy and practical was ready to step outside its traditional mold in 1979. That year, the company offered two (!) exciting new cars with only two doors. The more attainable two-door was the 242 GT we’ve covered previously, but that coupe was fairly spartan and focused slightly on performance. What about luxury? What about the grand touring businessman customer in America?

Volvo had previously not bothered with said luxury coupe customer, so what changed? Circa 1975 one Henry Ford II paid a visit to the Volvo factory in Sweden and shipped over a very Personal Luxury Lincoln Continental Mark IV to drive while he was there. Swedes in the local area and at the Volvo facility were most interested and intrigued by the enormous Lincoln. “Ett ögonblick” (one moment) said Volvo, as they set their designers to work on a Swedish take on the personal luxury coupe.

Volvo kept the new 262C’s work in-house: The two-door was penned by Jan Wilsgaard. Changes to the standard 262 two-door sedan included new pillars and roof, windshield surround, upper door frames, and cowl. Like the later 780, the 262C featured a chopped roof – nearly four inches lower than the standard car. 262C was not for fans of big hats.

The luxury coupe’s interior was much different from the 260 too, with standard equipment like central locking and power windows. There was air conditioning, cruise control, heated seats, and an interior swathed in button-tufted and ruched leather with luggage strap motifs. Unlike other Volvos, there were also big slabs of real wood inside. It was all very 1979. Most examples in ’79 and ’80 also had that special American touch: a vinyl roof. That option was removed for 1981.

Power carried over from the top end of the 260 and was provided either by 2.6- or 2.8-liter PRV V6 engines. A four-speed manual was the standard transmission, but most customers chose the three-speed automatic.

Volvo had no spare manufacturing capacity and handed the construction of the 262C over to Bertone. The Italians assembled the expensive coupes at their Turin factory. The majority of 262Cs were destined for the United States market, which was supposed to thoroughly appreciate an upscale coupe from Volvo. In North America, Volvo aimed directly at two established luxury coupe names: the Cadillac Eldorado and Mercedes 280CE. It did not go well, as the emeritus professors and practical people who purchased Volvos didn’t want such a garish coupe, and luxury customers respected a Cadillac or Mercedes badge far more than a Volvo one.

The 262C was canceled after the 1981 model year, with just 6,622 examples built. Afterward, Volvo took a break from luxury coupes for four years until the 780 arrived in ’86. Today’s 262C is a silver over black example from the early part of the model’s run. Yours for $24,000.

[Images: Volvo]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Russycle Russycle on Oct 05, 2021

    I remember seeing a couple vinyl-topped specimens back in the day. Weird car. I actually kinda like it without the vinyl.

  • Bocatrip Bocatrip on Oct 05, 2021

    The weak link for this unique Volvo was the V6....troublesome. The proven 4 cylinder would be the way to go if the lack of power could be tolerated. Good looking Volvo.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next