2024 New York Auto Show Recap -- A West Side Bounce Back?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

One of my favorite little nuggets of irony is that the Hell's Kitchen area of Manhattan is actually very well-to-do. It's not anything like any commonly imagined vision of hell, unless your vision of hell consists of yuppies, puppies, and way too many people.


The Jacob K. Javits convention center is in Hell's Kitchen, situated along the Hudson River between 34th and 38th streets. As an aside, if you're a New Yorker please don't @ me and say it's really in Hudson Yards or whatever. Wikipedia lists it as Hell's Kitchen and if Wiki says it, it must be true.

Ahem, I was going somewhere with this -- ah, right. Hell's Kitchen may have once been a nasty place, but it's nice now. And it's a good place to show a bunch of new cars to the residents of a city where many people don't drive.

That last sentence probably reads as more sarcastic than I intend it to. Just because much of New York is easier to navigate by foot or public transit, there's still a strong market for cars in and around the Big Apple. Mix in the fact that city is home to many members of the press who normally cover topics other than automotive, and the New York Auto Show tends to have a strong media day, regardless of what happens at shows in other cities.

This year, that was sort of the case -- there were enough debuts to keep us busy. But in a nod to how the world works these days, several automakers decided to do unveils in Manhattan but not at Javits or during the media day.

Nissan, Infiniti, and Genesis all had events before I even touched down at LaGuardia. Infiniti took the wraps off the QX80 on top of a 100-story Hudson Yards high-rise and Genesis apparently ferried media across the city via helicopter. Me? I kvetched about cab fare jumping $20 since the last time I hailed one, thanks to city surcharges.

Again, I digress. As I've said before, it makes sense from an OEM perspective to debut new models away from the madness of media day. You simply get more attention that way.

Regardless of whether an unveiling happened at Javits or not, the fact that five or six new vehicles were shown in New York sort of makes up for Chicago being so quiet that I didn't even write a recap.

Yes, most of the unveilings were refreshes -- the Nissan Kicks probably has the biggest redesign -- or concepts. But if you use auto shows as a barometer of the health of the industry, which you probably shouldn't, this one feels good.

I won't go so far to say that the automotive industry is stabilizing after a wild four years -- one auto show does not a sample size make. But the vibes in NYC were, from what I can see, generally positive. I didn't hear a lot of journalists grumbling about a lack of action, anyway.

Did I find heaven in Hell's Kitchen? I don't think I'd go that far, but it was definitely not purgatory.

Random and assorted musings, automotive-related and not:

  • Whenever one of us, usually former New Yorker Matt Posky, writes about city surcharges in New York, the topic seems academic to me. Seeing my cab receipt, though, made it real. I don't have enough knowledge to really do a deep dive on the politics of it all -- though I am generally in favor of reducing congestion and pollution -- but I do wonder how the working class deals with the cost.
  • Manhattan remains a great place for car spotting. Whether it's a Maybach GLS or the really clean drop-top Fox-body Mustang I saw street parked somewhere in the 30s, or the older Caprice I saw on my previous trip to Manhattan in January, there's always a cool car to see.
  • I took the subway for one round trip and noted the greater law enforcement presence, but the subway has never felt that dangerous to me. Perhaps there has been an overreaction to a few high-profile incidents?
  • I will wrap with this: If you're going to the auto show, or any big-city auto show, carve time for the side exhibits. Whether they are showing exotics, modified classics, or whatever, they are just as interesting as the main OEM booths.

With that, auto-show season downshifts from major events until SEMA and LA in the fall.

[Image © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on Mar 30, 2024

    NY auto show debuts are just a change of clothes. Santa Cruz proves this.

  • Carsofchaos Carsofchaos on Apr 01, 2024

    41% approval doesn't sound like "widely supported" to me, though I am sure it's widely supported by people who live in the zone. For the rest of us schmucks who have to commute in with no logical form of public transportation available (I'm in an area of New Jersey where to use public transportation would take me 2+ hours to get into the city) already paying $16 for toll and $20+ for parking, another $15 for trip is "abhorrent", especially when you and I both know the MTA will never, ever balance it's budget.

    Lots of folks I've met at the Auto Show over the years drive in, they are from PA, mid-state NYC, etc.

    • Ajla Ajla on Apr 02, 2024

      People driving in for an Auto Show aren't really "commuters" though. I'm not sure what the auto show's attendence is made up of but looking at the show website I don't think people driving in was zero.

      As your second paragraph points out the goal of the congestion charge is fewer vehicles on the road, so it isn't a big jump to say the show will have less driving-in attendence in the future. Whether that will be enough to matter to the show I can't say.





  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
Next