2024 Chevy Silverado Gets Diesel ZR2, TurboMax 2.7-Liter

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

General Motors has confirmed that the 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 will be receiving a number of updates, with the most interesting being the addition of an optional 3.0-liter Duramax turbo-diesel for the ZR2. The base-level 2.7-liter turbocharged inline-four has also been given a new name – TurboMax.


Chevrolet has said that the TurboMax powertrain, which is effectively unchanged from the previous year, will be available on the entire Silverado lineup. Despite the unit's 310 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque making a tad more sense in the smaller Colorado pickup, we imagine there are a few people looking at the full-size alternative and deciding they can make do with the feisty four-banger. 


Considering it can be optioned with the 9,500-pound Max Tow package, they may even be onto something. 


We assume there will also be a bevy of truck shoppers that are excited about the ZR2 getting the DuraMax diesel. As the alphanumeric combination that denotes the Silvardio variant most likely to go off-road, there was already a subset of buyers thinking that a diesel version would make for an idyllic survival truck. The inline-six 3.0-liter turbo diesel hasn’t been changed all that much, offering 305 hp and 495 lb-ft on the 2024 ZR2. But it does give General Motors an opportunity to dangle a diesel in front of the faces of consumers and presumably one that yields better gas mileage than the 6.2-liter V8 they’d otherwise be buying. 

Depending on what’s important to you, this could make the DuraMax (pictured) a desirable alternative to the V8 (which yields 420 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque). However, Chevy didn’t want to make the bigger motor less appealing and has given it a few bells and whistles to draw people in. For the 2024 model year, the 6.2-liter has been given a new active exhaust system with a Sport mode – meaning you can really cheese off the neighbors if you’d like to. 


Only the 5.3-liter V8 seems to have avoided being tweaked, renamed, or shifted around to different trims. Though that doesn’t mean the Silverado itself has avoided going under the knife for a nip here and a tuck there. Apple CarPlay and AndroidAuto have been added to the base 1500 WT, meaning the features are now standard regardless of trim. OnStar will also become available on all base model 1500s. The base model Work Truck will similarly be offered with front and rear parking sensors included as part of an optional safety package.


Additional Silverado lineup updates include two new exterior paint choices – Lakeshore Blue Metallic and Slate Gray Metallic — and the ubiquitous rear seat belt indicator.


The updated 2024 pricing has not yet been announced, nor has there been any formal news regarding sales dates. However, we would be surprised if you didn’t start seeing them on dealer lots by the fall.


[Images: General Motors]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Chuck Norton Chuck Norton on Apr 02, 2023

    Here we go-a lot of emotion without looking the specs of the 2.7 apparently......if you are looking at the specs and still complaining-I would like to know (realistically) what for...other than it's missing 4 cylinders.

  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Apr 02, 2023

    "Yes. Fullsized trucks need 4 cylinders. GM…WHAT A DISGRACE!!!"


    The true test for me would be how it tows my boat & enclosed snowmobile trailer compared to the 5.3 V8 in the 'Hoe.


    If It tows just as good or better, with similar fuel economy & has good long term reliability, I couldn't give a flying f$%k how many cylinders are under the hood.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next