Ford Recalls Cars They Don’t Make Anymore

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

We’ve often said that building cars is hard – and those difficulties don’t always end even after a company stops making them. It’s like bad news coming in even after one has turned off their phone. 


At issue this time around is the 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine which was an option in certain models of the long-departed Ford Focus compact car and Ford EcoSport thing tiny crossover. More specifically, a faulty belt tensioner arm on the belt-driven oil pump may fracture or separate from the tensioner backing plate. A busted oil pump would cause an obvious loss of oil pressure, potentially leading to engine damage (duh) or, in specific conditions, the loss of power braking ability. It’s the latter which has apparently caused a crash and two injuries.


According to docs provided to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) by suits at the Glass House, over two thousand warranty claims have been filed related to this issue. It is said the company had a look at this issue back in 2022 but determined it was not a safety concern. Jeez. To fix affected cars, Ford dealerships plan to replace the oil pump drive belt tensioner assembly with a redesigned part but, as with most things in life these days, the replacement parts are not currently available.


Specifically, the recall targets EcoSport models with a 1.0L EcoBoost engine and an automatic transmission manufactured between April 3, 2017 and Oct. 12, 2021. This is in addition to Focus sedans and hatchbacks with the same powertrain combo manufactured between March 24, 2015 and May 4, 2018. There are approximately 140,000 units covered under the recall.


Whilst we continue to mourn the loss of both the Focus sedan and hatchback, particularly its spicy variants, precisely no tears have even been shed for the wretched EcoSport. As an unpleasant log laid by a company panicking its way into a segment it should have been in ages ago, the EcoSport was neither eco nor sporty – but at least it was expensive with a terrible interior. You’ll notice other models in its segment (Kia Soul, et al) had and continue to have no trouble finding buyers while the EcoSport has shuffled to the side. We’ll let you speculate why in the comment section.


[Images: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 61 comments
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next