Ford Trademarks 'RS200' Name in Europe

by Matt Posky

Published: March 13th, 2024

Ford has trademarked an interesting name from its back catalog. Oval has filed trademarks for "RS200" and "Ford RS200" within the European Union Intellectual Property Office, according to our sister publication.

Based on reporting from AutoGuide, Ford appears to be reviving the name of the iconic mid-engine, all-wheel-drive sports car intended for homologation so it could run the model as a Group B rally car before fatal accidents (some of which included the RS200) encouraged the FIA to shut the racing division down. As a result, Group B cars have become automotive legends offering a sense of danger and unrestrained performance we’ve not really encountered since.

The small car seems like an obvious play for the automaker in an era where efficiency is becoming mandatory and heritage helps sales. There’s a mystique around the RS200 that will undoubtedly aid the brand’s marketing efforts, should such a vehicle go into production. However, it’s unlikely that a modern incarnation of the rally-bred vehicle will mimic the original beyond its general form.

An EV doesn’t seem out of the question, nor does the company trying to build a small-engined mainstream compact sports car. But the latter assumes the manufacturer has found a way to comply with emissions and ran the relevant cost analysis. We’ve even heard rumors that Ford was working on an amped-up version of the Puma — a compact model presently sold in Europe that likewise serves as the brand’s WRC car.

Interestingly, the Puma name was originally going to be affixed to sporting versions of the Ford Escort before the company decided to run with the RS2000 suffix. That model would arguably go on to be the brand’s best-known rally car until the RS200 debuted a decade later in 1984. Everything is connected. Life is a circle.

AutoGuide noted that a hypothetical RS200 could be based on the all-electric Mach-E. While the EV would undoubtedly result in a quick vehicle, it’s hard to imagine such a model being a success outside of Europe. However, this was just speculation on the part of the outlet and there’s nothing to indicate that Ford would even bother offering such a product in North America.

Truth be told, the market seems to be begging for something reasonably sized and competitively priced that’s fun to throw around. All-wheel drive is likewise fashionable right now, with the Mustang coupe only checking some of the aforementioned boxes. Based on the sales trajectory of American brands that culled small, affordable models from their lineup to chase down profit margins, it seems daft that Ford wouldn’t at least consider something small and sporty on our side of the Atlantic Ocean.

However, trademarks are often filed just so that a company owns the rights as a just-in-case. Ford may not have any formal plans for the RS200, tragic as that would be.

[Images: Ford Motor Co.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Ford #FordMotorCo #Trademarks #RS200

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 9 comments

1995 SC on Mar 14, 2024

The truth is likely in the last sentence...they probably trademarked it just to keep the rights to the name.

2 Reply
- Matt Posky on Mar 14, 2024
  
  Very strong odds.
  
  1
Zipper69 on Mar 14, 2024

The European market will still treasure the insanity of the original RS200, perhaps using the 2 door Fiesta base in either ICE or EV

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.