Kia Introduces K3 in Home Market. Will It Appear as Rio/Forte Replacement?

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Many manufacturers are busy running in the opposite direction from small, affordable cars, but there remain a few which are willing to play in this low(er) margin arena. Kia is one of them, with cars like the Rio and Forte – and it may be re-upping the latter in our market later this year.


Shown yesterday in its home market of Korea, the new K3 is a hecho en Mexico sedan which takes styling cues from several members on the crossover/SUV side of its family tree. Under the hood is a choice of 1.6-liter, paired with a stick or automatic, or 2.0L mill offered only with a paddle-shifted autobox in GT trim. The engines make about 120 and 150 horses, respectively. The 2.0L is similar in offering to what is in today’s Forte, though a top-spec GT-Limited packs a 1.6L turbo good for 201 ponies.

This is a brand that has been cranking out good-looking vehicles in recent years, and the K3 fits those efforts. Narrow headlights with a tracing of LED mascara line the front, bookending a modern take on what Kia used to call a ‘Tiger Nose’ grille. Smears of brightwork make the car look more expensive than it surely shall be, as do those snazzy 17-inch wheels. The reason we hedged our bets in the headline about this being a potential replacement for both the Rio and Forte in America lies in the K3’s overall length: Nearly four inches shorter than the 182.6-inch than the 2023 Forte but well over a foot longer than the wee Rio. 


Could Kia be employing a two-fer strategy? It’s not out of the question, especially with corporate cousin Hyundai ditching the Accent. Selling one small car and a bevy of subcompact crossovers would make a lot of sense given the buying tastes of most American shoppers. We’ve recently seen such consolidation at German brands, most notably with the upcoming CLE replacing both the C- and E-Class coupes at Mercedes-Benz.

Kia says the new K3 will be available in select markets starting from the fourth quarter of this year, with details on launch dates and model specifications to be announced by each country in due course. Does that include America or is this car just bound for emerging markets? We’ll have to wait and see.


[Images: Kia]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 30 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Aug 11, 2023

    My youngest daughter has a '23 Rio. Darned nice little car for $19k, and perfect for someone who's just starting out. I wish more carmakers would sell something like it.

    • Thehyundaigarage Thehyundaigarage on Aug 11, 2023

      And it’s got the 1.6 Gamma motor. Reliable engine, providing you do regular intake valve cleaning.


  • Principe Raphael Principe Raphael on Aug 12, 2023

    Looks like a 7/8 scale version of the old Optima. Tell me I’m lying…

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next