Mercedes-AMG Unveils 2024 CLE 53 4Matic+ Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Continuing to play fast and loose with the definition of the word ‘coupe’, Mercedes-AMG has rolled out its CLE 53 4MATIC+ Coupe for the upcoming 2024 model year. At least this one has two doors and isn’t applied to a high-riding crossover. 


Say what you will about Affalterbach’s etymology, this two-door one hell of a looker. Meant to replace both the C-Class coupe and E-Class two-door, this new tweener seeks to combine the C’s agility and sportiness with the interior space and elegance of the E. We’ll reserve judgement until actually climbing behind the wheel but this new approach makes sense; after all, there’s a decent argument to be made that the old C- and E-Class coupes appealed to roughly the same buyer. This way, there’s no internal cannibalization of sales.

This car gets the dash-to-axle ratio very right indeed, with a long hood featuring a brace of power domes leading back to a steeply raked windshield. Under the hood is an AMG-fettled turbocharge 3.0-liter inline-six cranking out 443 horsepower and 413 lb-ft of torque, though the latter can stuff its pants with 12 seconds of overboost to whip out an extra 30 lb-ft of twist. The 48-volt integrated starter generator is said to provide support at lower engine speeds with 23 ponies and 151 torques, though those figures are not wantonly added to total output. Think of them as coloring in the powertrain’s white space at parking lot speeds. Power is by a nine-speed transmission and 4Matic+ all-wheel drive. The likes of a drift mode, active engine mounts, and the like are all optional.

Its interior takes cues from several other Mercedes models whilst incorporating a series of unique equipment and AMG-specific displays. Customers can select from a raft of upholstery choices, trim inlays, and colorways. Optional AMG seats have more pronounced bolsters and are likely to hold you tighter than a naughty co-ed. All manner of digital wizardry inhabits the gauge cluster, including a Supersport display familiar to anyone who’s sampled an AMG in recent years.

Typically AMG flared front and rear fenders add track width, making this thing manspread an extra 2.3 inches afore and 3.0 inches astern compared to the standard Mercedes-Benz CLE. Around back we find two-part LED taillamps with 3D-type light bodies along with a dark red connecting design element sure to excite the heckblende portion of our readership.


Look for this model on dealer lots in the second half of the 2024 calendar year.


[Images: Mercedes-AMG]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Dec 06, 2023

    I remember when cars came from the factory without looking like it had a fart can exhaust installed. This is not an attractive car. The paint looks great, but the design, wheels and interior look off-lease Infiniti.


    I'll guess: 6 grand down, $1000/month with 7.5k miles/year.

  • The Oracle The Oracle on Dec 06, 2023

    What a tacky name. Alphabet soup

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next