Report: Toyota Boosts Wages Ahead of UAW Ratification Votes

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the United Automobile Workers (UAW) are preparing to vote on contract proposals offered by Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, non-union Toyota is increasing hourly wages. Hourly compensation has increased for the automaker’s U.S. manufacturing, distribution center, and logistics employees. It’s also offering more paid time off than before and reducing the time it takes for workers to reach top-tier compensation.

Considering Toyota had already issued two pay bumps for 2023, seeing a third is a bit of a surprise and likely has everything to do with the results of the UAW strike.


Based on reporting from Automotive News, it even looks like Toyota may have been bench-marking the new union contracts. Hourly wages are coming up a little more than 9 percent, resulting in a payment scheme that will look similar to what the domestic brands are offering when it goes into effect at the start of 2024.


From Automotive News:


The third increase, which goes into effect Jan. 1, was announced just over a month after Toyota raised wages 25 cents an hour to $31.86 for its production workers, effective Sept. 25.
The $2.94 raise announced Tuesday for production and other hourly employees is unusual in that the Japanese automaker typically increases wages twice a year. The raise amounts to a 9.2 percent increase for top-tier hourly employees above the wages Toyota put into effect Sept. 25.
The raise comes as the UAW reached tentative agreements with the Detroit 3 on lucrative new contracts. As to whether there is a direct causal link, the spokesman referred to a written statement from Chris Reynolds, executive vice president for corporate resources at Toyota Motor North America.


Skilled trades employees are said to be eligible for up to $43.20 an hour. That’s $3.70 more than the previous arrangement that went into action on September 25th. Wage progression has likewise been made shorter, now taking just four years (rather than eight) for new employees to reach the upper echelons of the payment pyramid.


"At Toyota, we take great pride in showing respect for people. We value our employees and their contributions, and we show it by offering robust compensation packages that we continually review to ensure that we remain competitive within the automotive industry," a Toyota spokesperson stated.


[Image: Toyota]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Nov 02, 2023

    Very disingenuous reply. The only reason OPEC and exports of oil have affected oil prices is we’re no longer producing a surplus of oil that meets 100% of the US’s oil needs as well as a surplus we can export after US requirements are met. Our ability to export excess oil created a surplus of oil in the global market driving down the price. Once that surplus was eliminated through the Biden Administration policies, the glut dried up and prices rose. We still export, at our own peril, to stabilize the global market and provide an alternative to Russian production, which would enhance their economy and further fund their war on Ukraine. Our reduced production capacity reduced supply which Abe economist would tell you will drive up prices unless demand is reduced by a commensurate amount. Right?

  • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Nov 02, 2023

    Trump dumps trillions in the money supply to feed hungry pols on his way out. Biden dumps trillions more on his way in to feed same scum. Three years later the price of everything we buy in the U.S. is up 30 to 200 percent. But yeah, inflation was caused by wage increases.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next