Drive Notes: 2024 Lexus GX 550 Premium AWD

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Today I am testing a 2024 Lexus GX 550 Premium AWD that may have just come from the national launch event.


I say that because this one is a pre-production unit. So it's not quite fully sorted. Still, a short loan this week has been instructive.

Price, by the way? Base is $62,900 and the estimated as-tested price, including the $1,350 destination fee, checks in at $66,450.

Pros

  • This is a torquey little f-- ahem. Anyway, there's plenty of twist on tap from the 3.4-liter twin-turbo V6, with 479 lb-ft on tap. Oh, and this thing isn't little, but you knew that.
  • Lexus interiors continue to be among the best in the biz, and now that company seems done with bizarre controls such as mouse pads and has shifted to the new Toyota infotainment over the dated and ugly unit, the cabin here is a very pleasant place to be.
  • The engine has a pleasing roar.
  • HVAC and audio controls are mostly easy to use, and the audio sounds good.
  • The seats are all-day comfy.

Cons

  • Too much engine noise intrudes. Same for wind noise at highway speeds.
  • The ride is a bit too stiff on broken pavement.
  • This particular tested didn't feel well put together on broken pavement, but that could be chalked up to it being an early build. Same with the first bullet point here.
  • Hopping into and out of Apple CarPlay is easy. However, trying to hop between two AM radio stations requires more menu-diving than it should.
  • There's body roll aplenty when cornering.
  • The blocky design is going to be polarizing.

See you next time

[Images © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 38 comments
  • ChristianWimmer ChristianWimmer on Feb 21, 2024

    The interior might be well-made, but the design is just hideous in my opinion. It’s to busy and there’s no simplistic harmony visible in it.


    In fact I feel that the nicest Lexus interior ever could be found in the original LS400 - because it was rather minimalistic, had pleasing lines and didn’t try to hard. It looked just right. All Lexus interiors which came after it just had bizarre styling cues and “tried to hard” if you know what I mean.

    • See 1 previous
    • Joel Joel on Mar 13, 2024

      Reminds me of the Citroen BX my parents rented when we went to Spain in 1990, it was fun to play with the air suspension but it was just a very sterile and soulless car. Par for the course for my dad, who was one of the guys who drives 64 in the passing lane and even straightened the curves without indicating which just drove people behind him nuts.






  • Fatima Fatima on Mar 02, 2024

    Too much engine noise so good !

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next