Used Car of the Day: 1994 Mercedes-Benz E320 Cabriolet

by Tim Healey

Published: December 11th, 2023

used car of the day 1994 mercedes benz e320 cabriolet

Today we bring you a 1994 Mercedes-Benz E320 Cabriolet that can either be a parts car or a project car.

The seller is getting rid of the car after 13 years because the reverse gear has given up the ghost. The car can still drive forward, however.

In addition to repairing or replacing the transmission, there is other work the car needs. This includes a window regulator for the driver's door and hydraulics for the top.

If you're interested in a cheap convertible, the ask for this North Carolina-based car is $2,500. Click here to check it out.

[Images: Seller]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#UCOTD #UsedCaroftheDay #UsedCars #MercedesBenz #1994MercedesBenzE320Cabrio #1994MercedesBenzE320 #MercedesBenzE320Cabriolet

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 33 comments

RHD on Dec 12, 2023

One of the red flags here is the brake dust on the front wheels. The owner doesn't bother to wash the car... or do preventive maintenance, such as rotating the tires.
You can count on having to do a very deep detail and complete tuneup, fluids changes, brake pads and the last 50,000 miles' worth of preventive maintenance, on top of fixing the top, the nicks and dents on the body and the other obvious mechanical issues. If you're a fan of MBs of this generation, and you love a project, then offer him $1,500 and maybe get talked up to $1,700. Then put aside double that for the stuff that needs fixing - as long as you do the work yourself.

2 Reply
- 28-Cars-Later on Dec 13, 2023
  
  Yup, this is a $2,500 bill for $10K.
  
  Like
28-Cars-Later on Dec 13, 2023
1. Rear bumper is jacked up.
2. Scratch on rear unibody.
3. Roof aftermarket or still factory?
4. Do the roof motors and folding mechanism parts still exist?
5. Do techs still exist to repair the roof (or is this still a period of very simple roofs with no sensors?)
6. Transmission needs rebuilt or replaced.
7. Motor needs, a lot most likely.
8. Muffler rusty which means the exhaust is as well, and probably rotted underneath (need check wheel wells).
9. Listed miles are conspicuously absent, so assume 200,000.
$500 as it sits, assuming its not completely rotted underneath probably worth messing with to the person who could just leave the roof down permanently and only drive on sunny days. Putting this back together properly may not be possible at this point (i.e. roof related unobtanium).
1 Reply
- See 1 previous
- MaintenanceCosts on Dec 14, 2023
  
  There are still shops rehabbing the top on these, so that shouldn't be impossible, just expensive. The rest is a matter of a thorough mechanical freshening, which is why this is a car for someone who can do that themselves. If they can there is potentially decent profit in it - these have a lot of fans.
  
  Like
- 28-Cars-Later on Dec 14, 2023
  I didn't know that, good to know. I have barely seen these in my entire life so they may be very valuable when in clean condition, but knowing what I know from the Volvos sorting this would be a labor of love and even when complete financially I'm not sure it would be worth it.
  I see four of these on Autotrader:
  
  '94, 65K, $17,9
  '95, 90K, $20,0
  '95, 42K, $22,4
  '95, 34K, $26,8
  Even in the hands of a Mercedes tech -and assuming no OBDI codes- I imagine the non roof or body related work is several grand. Then of course the roof is a big variable, I see rust on the rear wheel well similar to my Volvo so that needs repaired but suggests more rot underneath. Then the example has to be north of 100K otc, and is probably between 100 and 200K. So you sink at minimum $5K into it, pay $2K for it, and are sitting $7K with your own labor and what's it worth? $10? Most collectors are going to buy the examples on Autotrader with much fewer miles and use (that '94 is probably the best value buy with the 42K '95 being the best overall buy IMO). Unless you are a Mercedes master tech (or expert otherwise) from this period and know exactly what's wrong to price accordingly, this is a black hole of money and time which I doubt will be recouped later on resale - unless resale is 20+ years from now.
  Like

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.