Lexus Promises 'Flagship' Crossover Concept in Detroit; Is There Room for Another Model in the Lineup?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Toyota’s luxury division isn’t in the habit of leaving certain vehicle segments wide open for other automakers to plunder. Lexus fields not one, but two sport coupes, just in case one of the few buyers not interested in sedans and SUVs wanders into the dealership.

In the utility vehicle department, it seems Lexus has all bases covered, Or at least it soon will. There’s the compact NX crossover, the midsize RX (soon to be available in a longer, three-row variant), the midsize, body-on-frame GX, and the range-topping, BOF LX full-sizer (now with fewer seats, should you prefer it). There’s even a possibility of a subcompact Lexus utility in the near future.

So, what exactly is Lexus missing? A “flagship” crossover, it seems.

The automaker claims its LF-1 Limitless concept “reflects the next genre in luxury crossover vehicles,” and will debut at next month’s North American International Auto Show in Detroit. Sporting a body sculpted by the CALTY design studio in California, the vehicle is described by Lexus as “a flagship crossover that redefines the boundaries of luxury.”

Lexus provided a teaser shot appearing to show a two-row vehicle with a one-piece, wraparound taillight, split spoiler, and sharply angled rear glass. A strong character line appears to flow forward to parts unseen.

The only other takeaways from the image are a glass roof and media screens for rear-seat passengers. It’s impossible to gauge the vehicle’s size.

Unpacking Lexus’ brief description, are we to assume the brand has designs to offer an ultra-lux model in the unibody crossover segment? Certainly, it seems everything that could be done with crossover vehicles, has been. Over at BMW and Mercedes-Benz, German designers and engineers can’t stop turning utility vehicles into four-door coupes, endowing other variants with ridiculous levels of M- and AMG-supplied power.

What untapped pool of potential buyers does Lexus have in mind? Or is this concept just a design exercise and technology showcase meant to inspire the brand’s next-generation models? (If so, why use the word “genre,” which implies a new class, or category? Why bolster it with the word “flagship”?)

So many questions, so few answers. Should Lexus decide to add a new addition to its lineup, it would do so knowing full well where its bread is buttered. Lexus passenger car sales fell 20.1 percent in November, year-over-year. Over the first 11 months of this year, the brand’s U.S. car volume shrank by 22.4 percent.

Crossovers and SUVs, on the other hand, are keeping the lights on at Lexus HQ. Despite a pretty flat month in the industry, and with no new or refreshed model to spice things up, sales of Lexus crossovers and SUVs rose 1.2 percent, year-over-year, in November. Sales are up 4 percent YTD in 2017.

Adding another utility vehicle would surely mean a segment with two Lexus offerings. Still, if price points diverged enough, one vehicle wouldn’t necessarily cannibalize the other (though higher-end models in the lineup might get worried). As we told you yesterday, doubling up in a segment is not something Toyota’s worried about.

[Image: Lexus]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Dec 06, 2017

    Just like the RX L, this will print money for Lexus and they should have done it a decade ago. The LX and GX both have a great image among rich moms, but really aren't that practical for the intended use. The floor is high, cargo space is very limited, the third row gets in the way when stowed (especially on the LX), and the driving experience is very trucklike. But the RX just doesn't cut it as an image car. It's OK, but it's too cheap to really make a statement. Lexus will absolutely clean up with a proper three-row unibody crossover, based on a stretched and widened RX/Highlander platform, and priced in the $70k range to start. It will compete straight across with the current Audi Q7 and the BMW X7, just a bit downmarket from the Benz GLS.

  • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Dec 07, 2017

    There's definitely room at the top of Lexus's CUV lineup for a true full-size model (not just a 3-row midsize like the RX-L).

  • Zerofoo We leased a new CX-5 for my daughter when she started driving. We put nothing down and bought gap insurance. The theory was if she totaled the car, it was nothing more than a rental. If she kept the car in good shape and the car was reliable, we would, at the end of the lease, have the opportunity to buy a low-mileage 3 year old used car.
  • Peter KODAK Moment
  • Eliyahu Toyota has looked at the state of the world and decided that hybrids are the best fit for currently achieving environmental and regulatory goals. Their hybrid production is now across many of their models. Honda is following suit. They will both likely also produce some electric vehicles. The best path forward is likely higher fuel taxes, with some tax credit offsets for the lower tax brackets. This would encourage a move toward more fuel efficient vehicles. The US big 3 auto makers are the ones with the most to lose here-they are the late adapters-coasting on trucks.
  • 28-Cars-Later Used Teslas are getting very cheap, but buying one can be risky - Ars Technica Teslas are very connected cars, and many of their convenience features are accessed via smartphone apps. But that requires that Tesla's database shows you as the car's owner, and there are plenty of reports online that transferring ownership from Hertz can take time.Unfortunately, this also leaves the car stuck in Chill driving mode (which restricts power, acceleration, and top speed) and places some car settings outside of the new owner's level of access. You also won't be able to use Tesla Superchargers while the car still shows up as belonging to Hertz. Based on forum reports, contacting Tesla directly is the way to resolve this, but it can take several days to process; longer if there's a paperwork mismatch.Once you've transferred ownership to Tesla's satisfaction, it's time to do a software reset on the car to remove the fleet version.So apparently the state maintains title but so does Tesla in a way, and they cripple some features until they feel satisfied in unlocking them to you. How long till they brick it by satellite because, reasons? But yes, rah! rah! BEV! - its not a tool of tyranny at all, honest. Edit: Comment from the Ars forum: Happy MediumArs Tribunus Militum 19y When I got to the section that stated that THE CAR WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY CRIPPLED unless you get Tesla's acceptance of you buying the car, I got incredibly infuriated. How in the hell is this going to work going forwards? Is Tesla literally going to be approving every single resale of its cars from now until the car is totaled? Jeezus, connected is one thing, but having final ownership authority in the hands of the manufacturer and not the seller/purchaser seems horrible. 28's thoughts to Happy Medium.
  • Tane94 Subie has a cult-like devotion to its products, so it can do no wrong by being a late adopter in offering EVs. Mazda has rebranded itself from zoom zoom to affordable near luxury, with success. Toyota is most vulnerable to losing sales from not having EVs. The hybrid early adopters who made Prius their high-visibility flag bearer now have to look to another brand for a distinctive EV to righteously show themselves off.
Next