Infiniti QX Inspiration: The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

“I thought the sun rose in your eyes, and the moon and the stars were the gifts you gave … to the dark … and the endless skies, my love,” sang Roberta Flack in the heady and decadent early ’70s. Suffice it to say this writer didn’t feel the earth move in his hand upon gazing at the Infiniti QX Inspiration, not did his heart tremble like a captive bird.

The QX Inspiration, like the Q Inspiration concept of 2018, heralds Infiniti’s electric — or at least electrified — future, and it’s a future without a face.

On Friday, Infiniti dropped the towel on its concept crossover ahead of a debut at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. While the concept’s sedan counterpart made do with a slightly more conventional (but still clearly electric) front fascia, the QX Inspiration goes the creepy route taken by some of Volkswagen’s concepts. Much plastic acreage, but little in the way of grille. No grille at all, really. Just some black mesh along the lower fascia, a hood gap, and two vents leading to the air curtain fenders.

Premium automakers like Audi and Mercedes-Benz kept things pretty traditional while crafting their first electric crossovers for fear of scaring off loyal customers. Meanwhile, the always-electric Tesla gave up mimicking air-sucking internal combustion cars and dropped the fake grille on its Model S after the debut of the Model 3. Hyundai and Kia’s EVs also reside in the “less face” camp.

Still, tall vehicle have a lot of space to fill, and, as tall vehicles are what buyers want, today’s trend of absolutely gigantic grilles fits the consumer shift just fine.

Getting back to the QX Inspiration — while Infiniti plans a number of electric and electrified models in the coming decade, there’s no word yet on how this concept generates its power. There is, however, a clue.

In a release, the automaker said the QX Inspiration “represents Infiniti’s plans for high-performance electrified vehicles, offering complete range confidence while signaling a new era for Infiniti design enabled by new technology.”

Complete range confidence, eh? Seems to this writer that Infiniti’s signalling the domestic debut of parent company Nissan’s novel e-Power setup, which we learned last year the company was having difficulty adapting to heavier vehicles. With e-Power, already offered in the Japanese-market Nissan Note, a small gasoline engine running at a fixed speed generates electricity on the fly, which is then routed to a low-capacity battery to power an AC motor. The end result is instantaneous EV torque, low fuel consumption, and the ability to keep driving after actual EVs would have to charge up. It’s also relatively cheap.

As for Infiniti’s timeline for this and other vehicles, we’ll have to wait until the QX Inspiration’s January 14th debut.

[Images: Infiniti]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Spike_in_Brisbane Spike_in_Brisbane on Jan 04, 2019

    Infiniti (Nissan) could learn a thing or two about designing an SUV BEV from Jaguar.

  • Scott Scott on Jan 04, 2019

    Wasn’t the original Q a more or less grilless design, I don’t recall it looking ugly, might have been better to use it as inspiration. And those high sides and slit windows have to go,

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next