2019 Lexus LS 500 F-Sport Review - A Peculiar Development in Big Sedan Land

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2019 Lexus LS 500 F- Sport

3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6 (416 hp @ 6000 rpm, 442 lb/ft. @ 1600 rpm)
Ten-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
18 city / 27 highway / 21 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
13.1 city / 8.7 highway / 11.1 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
23.3 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price: $85,445 US / $105,352 CAD
As Tested: $88,685 / $112,053 CAD
Prices include $1,025 destination charge in the United States and $2,202 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

A big luxury sedan is sedate, ponderous, and numb. Insulation from everything outside the cockpit is paramount. Arriving refreshed and relaxed is the order of the day in this class of car.

The little F-Sport badge on the tail of this 2019 Lexus LS 500 changes everything. While one can still chauffeur grandma to church in class and comfort, after she’s been dropped off that drive can quickly change from refreshing to invigoration with a turn of a knob. The idea of a LS F-Sport is nearly as absurd as that of a Miata Brougham with a padded vinyl roof and opera windows. It’s a Brooks Brothers suit with a pair of Brooks running shoes.

It’s unexpected – but it works.

I’m a little disappointed that Lexus fitted this twin-turbo V6 to the LS, rather than keep some coupe/sedan harmony by dropping in the raucous, naturally aspirated V8 from the incredible LC coupe. I get it, though – the turbo six is a more refined, quieter engine than the blue-light-attracting twin-cam V8, better suited to the typical luxury sedan buyer. Still, when the drive mode knob atop the instrument binnacle is twisted to “S+”, the exhaust wakes up a bit, giving a bit of thrill to the normally-silent cabin. That S+ mode tightens the steering and quickens transmission shifts as well, both helping to shrink this big bruiser when hustling.

I’m not kidding. Yes, I sought the twisty backroads a couple of times rather than the interstate. You always know there are two tons of steel beneath your butt, but the steering is nicely weighted to allow the feel of the road into the hands. I wouldn’t do a track day in the LS 500, but it never hurts to put a grin on the face commuting home after a long day in the office.

I’m enamored with the styling of this LS – it’s no longer the conservative, staid Lexus of old. The spindle grille is done well here, especially with the interlocked mesh contours within the grille. Out back, the contour atop the fender gives additional muscle to the rear quarter view.

The interior is similarly ambitious. I love the horizontal strakes that flow across the dashboard, somewhat hiding the center vents. The backlit panel on the passenger-side dashboard is a bit goofy – I kept pressing at it and studying the manual to see if it actually did anything. It doesn’t. The widescreen display for audio and navigation is clear and bright, though sadly controlled via touchpad aft of the shifter. It’s slow to react to touch input at times, which can distract from the driving task at hand. Mercifully, many of the functions can be replicated via buttons adorning the steering wheel.

The perforated pattern on the leather seats is both attractive and quirky – the pattern looks to be limited to the F-Sport package, in case you’d prefer something a bit less busy. I rather like it, though I’d love to have the available Circuit Red leather rather than this black. I’m a sucker for red interiors.

Rear seat comfort is as one expects from a big Lexus sedan. Plentiful, roomy, leaving my kids in silence. The 10-year-old quickly dozed as I ran her across town to Grandma’s house for the day – a sure sign of a winning rear-seat experience.

I’m not the target market for a big, somewhat sporty sedan, by any means. This is a “captain of industry” car, while I’m at best an ensign. But for the admiral looking for a dreadnought that can drive like a cutter when needed, this LS 500 F-Sport would be a brilliant choice.

[Images: © 2019 Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Apr 04, 2019

    That is one weird looking car and the front is a disaster of epic proportions. The interior is well different. Thats the best I can say about it

  • Gedrven Gedrven on Apr 13, 2019

    At 4982lb (quoth Lexus.com) - that is, a case of beer away from TWO AND A HALF TONS - I wonder if this is the heaviest car ever to have "Sport" in the name?

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next