(Not) For Your Eyes Only: Jaguar Land Rover Loses Bid to Squash Defender Lookalike

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Imitation, as the saying goes, is the sincerest form of flattery, but Jaguar Land Rover’s been burned in the past, what with a certain Chinese automaker rolling out near carbon copies of its Range Rover Evoque crossover.

In the Defender lies far more heritage, but JLR just lost a bid to keep the visual rights to the boxy off-road beast in the UK, paving the way for British sales of a model that looks very similar to the much-loved previous-generation model.

As reported by Autocar, a UK court has rejected JLR’s effort to secure trademark rights for the envelope of its old Defender. This is music to chemical firm Ineos’ ears, as it intends to build the Grenadier — a model so steeped in British SUV design history, you’d think it came with a free FN FAL rifle and a land claim in Rhodesia.

Yes, it looks an awful lot like the old Defender, even after Ineos changed the grille to less resemble JLR’s property after the automaker hauled it into court. The legal battle against Ineos has raged for 4 years, with JLR appealing a 2019 ruling that said the Defender’s shape was too common to trademark. This week, the country’s High Court dismissed the appeal, claiming the original “verdict” from the UK’s Intellectual Property Office stands.

From Autocar:

In a statement, JLR noted its disappointment in the ruling, given that the Defender’s shape is already trademarked in a number of other markets. “The Land Rover Defender is an iconic vehicle which is part of Land Rover’s past, present and future,” it said. “Its unique shape is instantly recognisable and signifies the Land Rover brand around the world.”

Ineos responded by saying that the Defender’s design “does not serve as a badge of origin for JLR’s goods” and confirmed it will press ahead with plans to launch the Grenadier in 2021.

In the U.S., JLR was successful in trademarking its Defender design.

As for the actual vehicle itself, there remains some uncertainty about where exactly the Grenadier will be built. Ineos could carry on with its original plan to built it in Portugal before bringing it to the UK for finishing, though it’s reportedly engaged in talks to purchase a future-less Daimler plant in France.

[Image: Ineos]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Aug 06, 2020

    The projected price for this Ineos dinosaur is starting at GBP4Ok for a volume of 25,000 a year. Grenadier. Just rolls right off the tongue, doesn't it? A UK Brexit billionaire named Ratcliffe got Magna to design the chassis, which is supposed to be built in Portugal, with engines and transmissions from that well-known off-road vehicle supplier BMW, suspension of the cart spring variety from Italy, and assembly in the now disused Smart Car factory in France. Time, it's ebbing away for production beginning at the end of next year. By the time this bloke Ratcliffe, swollen with pride at the UK leaving the EU, has something to sell, the only British parts will be the brochure and the stick-on and iron-on decals available for little boys of the train-spotting brigade. And he will no longer be a billionaire but if he's lucky, a millionaire. The shape is trademarked by JLR in the US, so where are the sales to come from to make this thing work? And who were going to be the "lucky" chosen dealers anyway, before that door slammed shut? If one could spell nonsense a different way, it would be Grenadier.

  • Jarred Fitzgerald Jarred Fitzgerald on Aug 10, 2020

    Well, that's China for you, always with the "imitation game." Though I have to give it to JLR for standing up to these brand fakers. Looking at the photo, the design (in spite of the fact that it's a rip off) definitely has a saving grace, in the form of the grille change that Ineos did in order to try to avert the lawsuit. As with the JLR, I don't think I'll have any trouble buying spare tires and wheels as well if I were to fancy an Ineos Grenadier, since they look pretty much the same with the ones I've been buying from 4WheelOnline.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next