Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XIX)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We’re back with more Cadillac Eldorado today, in our final entry on the third generation models. We spent our last installment reviewing the special and sometimes troublesome engineering that was standard on the Brougham. Since then, I discovered this April 1957 edition of The Cadillac Serviceman, GM’s in-house magazine publication for its dealer service centers. Twelve clearly scanned pages of technical and service detail await you! After reading, return here and learn about the changes made to the Eldorado line in 1958.


Annual changes to vehicles kept customers coming back, marketing happy with new things to advertise, and made it clear to the general public if you could afford a new car (or not). In 1958 the hot new ticket was quad headlamps. Now legal in all states, all Cadillacs adopted them immediately. Everyone wanted to be seen in a new quad headlamp car, and with few exceptions domestic cars used the same four sealed beam lamps up front.


The Eldorado’s upper fenders had to be widened in 1958 to accommodate an extra set of lamps, and chrome bezels extended further toward the rear than in 1957. A sign of the times, the awnings over the headlamps retreated and disappeared as that trend faded from popularity. Though the hood was the same basic shape as before, notable changes occurred with regard to decor: The finned hood ornaments previously on the fenders migrated to the center of the hood, right where they lived in 1956.

At the prow, the Cadillac logo was wider than before to take up more surface area, along with a mildly enlarged V decoration underneath. The hood shut line was newly horizontal, and no longer gave way to inset Dagmars. Instead, those pointy decorations moved toward the outward edge of the grille. Their shape was slightly less pointed at the tip than in 1957. 


Leading inward toward the center of the grille there was a new chrome strake on either side, set into a new egg crate grille. The grille had circular bullet type protrusions from the intersections of the grille vanes, and was a more subtle take on Buick’s Fashion-Aire Dynastar grille. That grille was a ‘58-only design, as Buick introduced the disastrous Limited lineup. Worth noting, GM was reeling at the time stylistically and its upmarket and luxury ‘58s were an attempt to catch up to Virgil Exner’s very successful Forward Look Chrysler and Imperial models of 1957.

At the lower portion of the bumper 1958 Eldorados returned to a square parking lamp, though the use of chrome heavy-handedness increased that year. The big bumper extended further back toward the wheel than the prior year, as the Eldorado grew in length from 222.1 inches in 1957 to 223.4 inches in 1958. The wrap-around chrome vent detail of 1957 was replaced by a U-shaped design instead, which no longer wrapped around the front corner. 


Above it was an additional piece of chrome trim placed over a character line that was previously unadorned. There was no longer Seville or Biarritz script above that body detailing. Instead, the Cadillac crest returned just ahead of the door, in gold. But designers weren’t nearly finished adding trim in 1958!

Aft of the door, 10 vertical chrome spears appeared. They served no particular purpose, but added a bit of visual heft to an already heavy side profile. But the real weighty-looking additions were left for the ‘58 Eldorado’s backside.


The quad gunsight ports used for reversing lamps and the integrated exhaust were gone. Instead exhausts exited underneath the bumper, and a new eggcrate and bullet-inspired chrome assembly took their place. These large ovoid shapes were the reversing lamps, and the lens was huge. 

The bumper shape no longer extended from the wheel arch chrome to wrap under the Eldorado, but instead terminated with a horizontal platform on either side. Further inward next to the license plate, there were a set of 10 additional chrome strakes, matching the design of those on the rear fender. That’s 30 total strake details if you lost count. 

Finally, the traditional V and Eldorado block lettering was relocated to the left side of the trunk for 1958. The V itself was made narrower, almost to look like a bird. Block lettering was more stylized and larger than the prior year. 


As one might expect, the low-volume Eldorado Brougham did not receive a handy front and rear clip update like other Cadillac models. Instead, some updates were made to its interior. 1958 Eldorado Broughams had leather appointments at the top of their door panels in place of metal the prior year. There was also a new turbine-type wheel cover, in place of the spoked wheel Brougham shared with other Eldorado models in 1957.

There was also some special model advertising in 1958 to celebrate General Motors’ 50th production year. Dubbed the “Golden Anniversary” models, the line began with the newly minted Chevrolet Bel-Air Impala and Pontiac Bonneville Catalina, and moved up to the Oldsmobile Starfire 98, the slow-selling Buick Limited Riviera, and finally the Eldorado Seville. Notable here, the Seville eclipsed the Biarritz as the top-line standard Eldorado offering. 


Recall the original idea of Eldorado was as a halo convertible. No longer, customers preferred the hardtop coupe! The “Golden Five” was just a marketing tactic, however. There’s no evidence to suggest any special limited editions were issued as part of this 50th anniversary. 

Leaner times and an economic recession in 1958 would ensure the third-gen Eldorado was a rare one. Compared to 6,050 Eldorado sales in 1956, 1957 saw 1,800 Biarritz and 2,100 Sevilles rolled from showrooms, along with 4 special-order Sedan Sevilles. Just 400 Eldorado Broughams were sold. 


For its second outing in 1958 with more awkward styling, recession-addled Americans purchased just 815 Biarritz convertibles, and 855 examples of the Seville. Buyers of the Eldorado Brougham were wealthy enough to be immune to a recession, and the sedan managed 304 sales that year. 

And wealth was certainly required, as the 1957 Eldorado Brougham was $13,074 ($147,000 adj.), far and away the most expensive production car in the US at the time. It was in a different league to the likes of the Seville or Biarritz at $7,285 ($81,910 adj.). Brougham was seen more in line with the Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud or the elegant Facel Vega.


The following year in 1959 it was time for a do-over of Cadillac styling, where GM could take aim at Virgil Exner’s work more directly. Rocket inspired looks, even more chrome, and the biggest fins ever? Check. See you next time.


[Images: GM, seller, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Ras815 Ras815 on Mar 30, 2024

    Loved reading that Serviceman brochure.


    I cracked up at all of the warnings about NOT OPENING THE DOORS while the Brougham is off the ground ("this would activate the air suspension system"). Must have been a nightmare for mechanics...

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 01, 2024

    Much prefer the front end/face on look with the quad headlights. Although it does appear very similar to the grille of a full sized Chevrolet of the same year. From the rear window back the looks in my opinion are better suited to a smaller vehicle. And I am still not a fan of the vestigial tail fins used in 1957 and 1958. With fins either go big or go home. Extra large tail fins and massive amounts of chrome make a definite 'I have arrived' statement. So am really looking forward to all the columns that Corey will dedicate to the '59 model year.

    • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 02, 2024

      I certainly prefer the back end of the Pontiac to that of the Cadillac. And probably the rear side view.

      And it finally struck me, the rear view of the silver Cadillac in this column (the 2nd last photo) reminds me of the rear view treatment of the corresponding generation of Corvette. Does anyone else see that resemblance?




  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next