Ford Trademarks ‘Lightstream’ Name, Could Portend Performance Truck

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Eagle-eyed fans of the Blue Oval brand have spied a new trademark filing, one which could hold promise for a future performance – street or off-road – variant of the Lightning pickup truck.


Showing up in government docs as the Lightstream, the word certainly doesn’t mean much in a vacuum. And, as we all know, car companies tend to trademark both names and product ideas all the time – few of which ever see the light of day. Sometimes this is to guard and protect an idea or innovation while other times it is to misdirect its competition (and media, it must be said).


Nevertheless, it’s an open secret that Ford would like to introduce different variants of the Lightning, including high performance model (as if 775 lb-ft of torque in a pickup isn’t enough) and an off-road beast. The latter, with knobby tires and lifted ride height, would surely play hell with official range estimates but the specter of a well-balanced Lightning tearing across desert dunes or doing all-wheel drive burnouts on a dry lakebed are too good not to mention.


It is this writer’s opinion that the Raptor designation would be a natural fit for such shenanigans, especially given all of the positive equity built up in that sub-brand. With the name spreading from the F-150 to the Bronco and now to its Ranger cousin, introducing it on the Lightning would be a logical step. And it’s not like Ford is afraid to court controversy with naming conventions – look at the ire they raised with the Mustang Mach-E. They're also not above making dad jokes, as proven by recently introducing the Lightning Flash.


The application for Lightstream was made in late November, suggesting at least someone at the Glass House has this thing at part of what is surely a too-long PowerPoint presentation. As for the filing itself, it unhelpfully describes the terms usage as relating to “Motor vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, four-wheeled motor vehicles, sport utility vehicles, off-road vehicles, electrically powered motor vehicles, structural parts and fittings therefor.”


Again, that’s boilerplate stuff to throw us all off the scent of what they’re actually planning.


We’ll keep our ears to the ground and an eye on the forums for more details.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 06, 2023

    See? This is what I have been saying all along. This is what Ford needs. They need more trucks! There is room between the Maverick and the Ranger for at least two new platforms, and probably three between the Ranger and the F-150. And what about a truck between the F-150 and the Super Duty? Surely there is room for one more? And trims? Yes!! Hundreds of trims! Ford needs to be more creative with trims. Remember the Levis trimmed Jeeps from way back? Well Ford, how about a "Kirkland Jeans" trim? Cool! Put a price of $80,000 on it and you'll sell every one you can build. Ford, you can have that idea for free. It's just one of many I have. Contact me for more.


    What people are clamoring for are more trucks in the $60,000 to $100,000 range. Dealers can't get enough of them!

    • See 1 previous
    • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 07, 2023

      SCE - I don't dispute that. If people assess their 'needs' and come up with a truck so be it.


  • El scotto El scotto on Dec 07, 2023

    A Ford Maverick Lightsabre! May the G-Force be with you! No Jedi mind tricks, just instant torque. These aren't the ICEs you're looking for.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next