Dan O’Brien Kia Hit With $1.25m Judgement for Deceptive Practices

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

“There is no choice but for them to improve. They have to find a way to meet customer expectations.” Those are the words uttered by Steve Center, Chief Operating Officer of Kia America, at this year’s L.A. Auto Show in response to questions about the brand scoring dead last in a sales satisfaction survey about its dealerships. 


Well, it seems Dan O’Brien Kia of New Hampshire either didn’t get the memo or is hell-bent on becoming the poster child for Center’s ire. After all, being told to pay $1.25 million in a deceptive practices settlement are unlikely to ingratiate the place to their brand’s COO.


As reported by Automotive News [ ]link], Dan O’Brien Kia must pay that sum to their state’s attorney general in order to resolve allegations of unfair and deceptive practices. Apparently, the bureau found dealership employees “persuaded consumers into purchasing vehicles they could not afford using deceptive sales practices; falsely inflated consumer income information on loan applications; and forged the signature of a customer on loan paperwork.” Fun stuff.


It gets worse. The AG says dealership staff at Dan O’Brien Kia roped customers with poor credit scores into some sort of rehab program which was purported to rebuild one’s financial status so long as they kept up payments for the first six months of the note. However, the AG details this as nothing more than some sort of sales pitch that had no affiliation with a bank, despite suggestions made to the contrary during vehicle negotiations. 

Beyond the financial restitution, the New Hampshire Department of Justice also set out a number of terms by which the Dan O’Brien Kia must abide. They include fun activities like hiring an independent compliance monitor for five years to review and report on its business practices plus recording audio and video of financing discussions between employees and customers.


That last decree is sure to frighten the tar out of finance clerks at Dan O’Brien Kia - at least between sessions of posting pics of their fake Rolex on social media, ignoring cash deals on their desk, and ruining the salesperson’s chance of getting a perfect CSI score on the survey.


Automotive News also states the Consumer Protection and Antitrust Bureau was investigating Dan O'Brien Kia Concord based on a high volume of consumer complaints filed between 2019 and 2021. Good times.


[Images: YouTube]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Douglas Douglas on Dec 22, 2022

    I bought a new Vibe for my wife in 2007 and used a technique I learned from a friend. The basic rule is: NEVER talk to a salesperson at a dealership. I emailed every Pontiac dealer in a 150 mile radius telling them what we wanted and asking for a quote. I got back quotes all over the place, plus various come-ons, plus every technique under the sun to get me on the phone or into the dealership. I simply took the lowest quote, copied it and sent it back to everyone asking if anyone wanted to beat it. Like magic previous restrictions fell away, though one dealer told me to go jump. I wound up with a really fantastic offer on a Vibe with every add-on imaginable (I'd been asking all along for the most stripped down, cheapest version). Bought the car (they delivered it). In talking to them at delivery I learned this dealer had actually done a swap and gotten the car from the dealer who told me to go jump in a lake! My mechanic pointed out six months later the car needed an inspection, so I learned one other thing: if you go through a dealer's lot, look at inspection stickers. They tell you when the car arrived at the dealership. If a car has been on the dealer's lot for six months like mine, they are bound to be very motivated to sell it.

  • Dougjp Dougjp on Dec 22, 2022

    I look at the pictures and the immediate thought was, this guy woke up after a bender, upside down, and the first thing he thought of was..... lets start shaving immediately !! :)


    Why oh why seek to be ultra ugly and somehow think you are funny? Worth a smile? Worth (gulp) laughter? Huh? I don't actually (and obviously) think so !


    Reminds me of the the old song, "Just one look, that's all it took " ! And NOT in a good way, I might add :D

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next