Honda Recalling 450,000 Vehicles Over Seat-Belt Defect

by Matt Posky

Published: March 17th, 2023

honda recalling 450 000 vehicles over seat belt defect

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a notice that nearly 450,000 Honda and Acura models are being recalled over seat-belt latches that may malfunction.

Noted as a manufacturing defect in the report, it sounds as though the release button can get stuck and prohibit the seat belt from being properly secured. This represents an obvious safety concern that Honda and its supplier are going to be required to address.

The NHTSA issued a letter to the automaker on March 14th, estimating the full tally as 448,613 units from the 2018-2020 model years. But Honda was already on the case and had determined that a safety defect existed – prompting it to conduct a safety recall – by March 2nd, meaning the NHTSA’s later documentation was just the obligatory paperwork being filed.

While the total number of cars is not broken down by individual models, we do know which vehicles are impacted. Affected models include certain examples of the 2018-2019 Accord (including Hybrids), 2017-2018 CR-V, 2019 Insight, 2018-2020 Odyssey, and the 2019-2020 Acura RDX. Federal regulators likewise estimated that only about 1 percent of the pool actually possesses the relevant defect “based on supplier and manufacturing records.” Though they’ll still all have to be checked to satisfy the terms of the recall.

“The seat belt buckle channel for the driver and front passenger seat belts were manufactured out of specification, causing interference between the buckle channel and the release button,” explains the report. “With continuous use, the buckle channel surface coating may deteriorate over time, and the release button may shrink against the channel at low temperatures, increasing friction. This can result in issues with the seat belt buckle latching.”

Beyond the problem being limited to the front seats, additional details are absent at this juncture.

Honda first caught wind of the issue in 2019 and reportedly launched an investigation that included testing the relevant parts at extremely low temperatures that same year. However, serious concerns about the scope of the problem don’t seem to manifest until late in 2022. Honda has also stated that (as of March 2nd, 2023) it had received 301 warranty claims pertaining to the issue between March 22, 2019, and January 16, 2023 – none of which were accompanied by any reports of injury or death.

Dealers will replace the driver and front passenger seat belt buckle release buttons or the buckle assemblies as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed notices starting April 17, 2023. However, owners may contact Honda customer service at 1-888-234-2138 or utilize the NHTSA website for more information.

[Image: Stanislavskyi/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Honda #Acura #Recalls #Safety #NHTSA

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 9 comments

Cprescott on Mar 20, 2023

...but the defective parts were well installed!

1 Reply
Schurkey on Mar 20, 2023

Decades later, I'm still peeved that Honda failed to recall and repair the seat belts in my '80 Civic. Well-known issue with the retractors failing to retract.

Honda cut a deal with the NHTSA at that time, to put a "lifetime warranty" on FUTURE seat belts, in return for not having to deal with the existing problems.

Dirtbags all around. Customers screwed, corporation and Government moves on.

Like Reply
- Sgeffe on Mar 21, 2023
  
  They’re just screwing up the vehicles that made their name for them! Witness the new “Accord!” A Camry with an “H” on the trunk!
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.