Mercedes-AMG Unveils New GLC Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Yes, we know – news of a crossover with ‘coupe-like’ styling isn’t likely to raise the pulse of many commenters, especially one painted approximately the same color as the pavement on which it is driven. The new GLC Coupe may be a stern German shown in a dour shade of paint, but its 671 horsepower and 752 lb-ft of torque make it anything but boring.


Billed as the brand’s “first performance hybrid SUV coupe”, the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe does cut a handsome if immediately recognizable figure. Appending that five-letter word to its name ensures the thing has a lot more sport than utility thanks to its dramatic roofline which cuts sharply into cargo space compared to a normal GLC. Alert readers will have correctly determined there is some form of electrification under the hood, tipped off by the ‘E Performance’ moniker and the fact that just about everything introduced these days has some measure of juice on board.


In this example, the 63 variant combines a 2.0-liter turbo engine with an electric drive unit on the rear axle. This combo is good for the aforementioned 671 ponies and 752 lb-ft of twist and funnels its power through a nine-speed transmission and 4Matic all-wheel drive. If you care, the engine itself contributes 469 horses and 402 torques to this equation. Score one for its electric drive unit, though it is worth noting that buried in the bumf is a notation the electrified guts make their maximum grunt of 201hp for 10 seconds at a time; its continuous output is 107 horses. In other words, it seems like the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe will belt out a total of 576 horsepower in most conditions, with the full-fat 671 figure reserved for launches and the like. A lightweight 6.1-kWh battery is located above the rear axle.

An entry-level model called the GLC 43 4Matic Coupe, also powered by a 2.0L four banger, is able to produce 416 horsepower plus an additional 14 ponies via a belt-driven starter generator at lower engine speeds. Like the 63 trim, it gets the nine-speed automatic which deploys a wet starting clutch in place of a torque converter. Merc estimates this model will scamper to 60 mph from rest in about 4.8 seconds while it more powerful brother will run the course in approximately 3.5 ticks of the clock. It is worth mentioning the weight disparity, with the 43 listed at 4,389 pounds while the 63 bends the scales at nearly 5,100 pounds despite both cars setting down identical footprints. Electrified guts tend to be tremendously heavy, after all.


The cabin is typical Mercedes, which is to say stern but comfortable with a duo of enormous screens up front. As with so many models from the brand these days, a landscape tablet sits ahead of the driver serving duty as a gauge cluster while a portrait tablet dominates the center stack as mission control for infotainment. Both can be configured umpteen different ways, with the likes of AMG Track Pace tools and an AMG-exclusive display style on hand so owners can brag to their passengers.

Expect to see these machines in 2024, though the 43 and 63 may end up being different model years.


[Image: Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 26, 2023

    Does this monster above its weight? I am very impressed.

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 26, 2023

    -channeling my inner Kenneth Mars- It is a coupe because Merzedes say's it est une kupe! Quiet schweinhunds! Dis is zee best kupe in zee vorld! Merzedes says so! Zee best or nothing Mein Herrs!

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next