Rivian Drops Another One Percent of Its Workforce As It Chases Profitability

by Chris Teague

Published: April 18th, 2024

rivian drops another one percent of its workforce as it chases profitability

Electric-only automakers are going through it right now. Tesla recently laid off 10,000 workers after posting disappointing first-quarter sales numbers, and now Rivian is slashing another one percent of its workforce after layoffs earlier this year.

A company rep told Automotive News, “We continue to work to right-size the business and ensure alignment to our priorities. This was a difficult decision, but a necessary one to support our goal to be gross margin positive by the end of the year. Rivian’s first 2024 layoff cut about ten percent of its salaried staff.

The automaker has cited rising interest rates and economic challenges as barriers to its growth. Demand for high-priced EVs is also slowing as the market moves past eager early adopters to mainstream buyers who are less willing to pay a premium to have the latest and greatest.

Rivian’s two current models are far from what anyone would consider affordable, but its next-generation R2 and R3 promise more reasonable prices. That said, we’re still more than a year away from those models going on sale, and the company needs to stay afloat until then.

Almost all automakers have struggled with EV profitability, as even Ford has reported severe losses from its electric vehicle business. That problem is compounded for electric-only companies like Rivian and Tesla, where there are no hybrids or gas-only vehicles to bring home the bacon while they figure out how to move EVs. Rivian has a compelling product offering, but it has proven difficult for it to gain a foothold in a market dominated by Tesla and more established automakers.

[Image: Rivian]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Rivian #autoindustrylayoffs #Tesla #evdemand

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 33 comments

Shipwright on Apr 19, 2024

off topic.

I wonder if the truck in the picture has a skid plate to protect the battery because, judging by the scuff mark in the rock immediately behind the truck, it may dented.

2 Reply
- See 1 previous
- Redapple2 on Apr 19, 2024
  
  .......and suddenly: INOP. 10 miles from civilization!
  
  1
- MaintenanceCosts on Apr 19, 2024
  
  There's a basic layer of battery protection in all the trucks. You can get a second layer if you order the All-Terrain Upgrade package (which also gets you a spare tire and smaller wheels with A/T tires).
  
  1
TheEndlessEnigma on Apr 19, 2024

And yet government continues to grow....

1 Reply

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.