Struggling Fisker Could Get a $400 Million Lifeline from Nissan

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Things looked promising for Fisker at first, and the automaker actually delivered on its promise to design and manufacture a new EV. Even so, the automotive market is brutal and unforgiving, and Fisker’s fortunes have turned as it has had an uphill battle getting its new Ocean SUV out the door. The company recently announced a layoff of 15 percent of its workforce and said it would pause investments until it could find a new partner.


It now appears that help could come from Nissan, who, according to Reuters, might be close to investing $400 million into the struggling EV maker.


Sources told the publication that Nissan’s investment would give it access to Fisker’s EV technologies, including its platform engineering and technology. In turn, Nissan would build Fisker’s already-announced Alaska electric pickup truck. The automaker would also build a Nissan-branded pickup on the same platform.


Fisker has always been chasing manufacturing partners, eventually landing on Magna to build the Ocean. While its technology would certainly help Nissan – which has been slow on the draw with EVs and has had its ups and downs, with the Ariya EV seeing a significant delay.


This deal could be the lifeline Fisker needs to pull through the storm, but it doesn’t bode well for other upstart electric automakers. The complexities and extreme costs involved with spinning up a new auto brand and models are hurdles to cross, but companies then have to contend with wavering demand in the United States, which may take other new automakers down a few pegs if things don’t pick up this year.


[Image: Fisker]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Mar 05, 2024

    NIssan used to be a great brand with a similar reputation to Honda or Toyota - better at times with specific products. Now and with much thanks to outlets such as TTAC they are beneath Hyundai, Kia or Genesis.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 05, 2024

      You can't stand outside the barn in your lululemon and try to make serious comments. If you have a contribution to make, you need to join us and get comfortable.



  • VoGhost VoGhost on Mar 05, 2024

    But who will save Nissan?

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 05, 2024

      My reasoning: You know everything and you never listen to anyone, therefore your parents must have been incredibly knowledgeable, the kind of people in demand at any automaker.

  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
Next