The Polestar 4 Gets Big Power but No Back Window

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Though it’s a bit more adventurous and sporty than its parent company, Polestar’s designs haven’t drastically strayed from Volvo’s calming look. That’s changing – albeit slightly – for 2024, with the introduction of the Polestar 4. The coupe-SUV features a concept car look, including a large solid panel where the back window should be.


Polestar offers two powertrains, including a single-motor rear-drive variant with 272 horsepower and a 373-mile range estimate on the WLTP cycle. The dual-motor version delivers 544 horsepower and a range estimate of 348 miles, and Polestar claims a 3.8-second 0-60 mph time. Bi-directional charging is standard, allowing the Polestar 4 to charge other EVs and external power equipment. 


The elephant in the room with the exterior design is that Polestar left off the rear window. Instead, the cabin features a high-definition screen that features a wide-view display of the rear of the vehicle. Polestar said the feed could be deactivated to allow the front passenger to see people in the back. 


Polestar increased its use of sustainable and recycled materials and said the new upholstery material is made from 100 percent recycled polyester. The carpets were made using recycled plastic, and other plastics incorporate more recycled material instead of introducing new plastic to the manufacturing process. The automaker said it designed the interior with more common base materials to reduce waste. 


A 15.4-inch touchscreen comes standard, running on Google’s Android Automotive OS. The update brings Google built-in services, including Maps, Assistant, and the Google Play app store. A 1,400-watt, 12-speaker Harman Kardon sound system is available, and the 4 comes standard with Apple CarPlay. 


Polestar retains Volvo’s heavy focus on vehicle safety, and the 4 gets several advanced driver aids. It comes with 12 cameras, a dozen ultrasonic sensors, and interior cameras for driver monitoring. Polestar said it does not collect the interior video, noting that it’s only used to make sure the driver is paying attention. 


[Image: Polestar]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Garrett Garrett on Apr 20, 2023

    The problem with this, or with rearview mirror LCD displays while the car is underway, is physics.


    You eye focuses differently when looking at a screen than when looking at images in a mirror. When you take your eyes off the road to look in a mirror, the focal length can stay the same - not so with a screen.


    Essentially, you force people to quickly go from distance to near and then back to distance every time they want to see what's behind them. Meanwhile, Millennials are just about to start hitting that age when they have to move their glasses to read a menu.

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jul 18, 2023

    Instead of showing you the outside, here is a picture of what's outside. Volvo has really lost it's way as this is in no way safe.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next