2023 Kia Niro EV Wave Review – Under the Radar

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Kia Niro EV Wave Fast Facts

Powertrain
Permanent magnet synchronous electric motor (201 horsepower @ 6,000-9,000 RPM, 18 lb-ft 0-6,000 RPM)
Transmission/Drive Layout
Single-speed automatic, front-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPGe
126 city / 101 highway / 113 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100km
1.9 city / 2.3 highway / 2.1 combined (NRCan Rating)
Estimated Range
253 miles / 407 kilometers
Base Price
$44,550 (U.S.) / $52,995 (Canada)
Price As Tested
$47,570 (U.S) / $56,094 (Canada)
Prices include $1,300 destination charge in the United States and $2,849 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

The Kia EV6 gets most of the attention when it comes to Kia EVs. That and the upcoming EV9. But the EV version of Kia’s Niro flies a bit under the attention radar.


Perhaps it shouldn’t. It’s not a sexy sportster like the EV6, so it’s understandable that the styling won’t turn heads, but the overall package is pretty commuter friendly.

A bit boring, maybe, but useful enough. Maybe that relative lack of spice is exactly why this version of the Niro isn’t catching attention like the EV6.

Like most EVs, the Niro Wave has torque on tap right away, though it’s not as fleet afoot as some others. It’s quick enough but won’t leave you grinning the way the EV6 can (especially in GT trim). Handling is similarly unremarkable – it’s good enough to avoid being a letdown but not good enough to make you want to attack the nearest on-ramp in anger.

The ride is inoffensive – calm enough for serene commuting without being unduly soft.

Dynamically speaking, this is a car that you forget about the second you park it. That’s not an insult – the Niro is good enough that you’ll drive it happily. It’s just not going to give you an extra serving of fun.

It’s sensible shoes. It’s healthy yet somewhat tasty comfort food. It’s a cozy, basic dwelling.

This continues in the cabin – the Niro has a layout that’s familiar across the Kia line by now. There are large dual digital screens for gauges and infotainment and a large, round shift knob. Buttons and knobs are minimal, and one can flip between key audio and HVAC controls by tapping an icon in a control strip that lies below the infotainment screen.

The car is generous when it comes to front headroom, but a sloping roofline cuts into rear head space a bit. Kia has added a wide, vertical “stripe” panel that’s a different color in order to give some more flavor to the otherwise generic styling. A large lower fascia threatens to swallow things whole, though the look is still more cohesive than with other vehicles that use similar sculpting.

The Niro Wave’s electric motor puts out 201 horsepower and 188 lb-ft of torque, which gets to the front wheels via a single-speed automatic transmission. Maximum range is claimed at 253 miles, and charge time will take seven hours on a Level 2 charger. A Level 3 can get you from 10 to 80 in less than 45 minutes. The lithium-ion battery is 64.8 kWh. One neat touch is paddle-controlled adjustable regenerative braking.

Standard features include satellite radio, wireless cell phone charger, dual-zone climate control, keyless entry and starting, remote start, a power liftgate, 17-inch wheels, roof rails, and LED daytime running lights.

Standard safety aids include forward-collision avoidance assist, rear blind-spot collision avoidance assist, lane-following assist, safe-exit warning, smart cruise control, and highway driving assist.

The top-trim Wave – Wind is the lower trim – adds a power sunroof, LED headlamps and fog lamps, remote parking assist, head-up display, Harman/Kardon audio, digital key, cooled front seats, heated steering wheel, LED interior lights, park-distance warning, and a battery heater. A package added heated rear seats. As tested, my Snow White Pearl ran $47,570.

The Niro Wave EV is a nicely done package that is only remarkable in how unremarkable it is. EV shoppers looking for a commuter that offers little fuss or muss will do just fine. Those hoping for more verve will like elsewhere.

Sometimes flying under the radar is a good place to be.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 15 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Jul 09, 2023

    the author claims, with a straight face, that


    "The Niro Wave EV is a nicely done package that is only remarkable in how unremarkable it is."


    Really? Do you think its huge gaping "whale shark" grille is ... "nicely done"? It is ATROCIOUS.


    Have you even bothered, oh lazy (or worse!) author, to compare what you get here and at what price, with the current Model 3, which is now cheaper than a Damned CAMRY, and has much superior performance and efficiency than this little ugly breadvan?


    Not to mention the Chevy Bolt, which can be had for $18K after tax credit, and has MORE range than this little POS?


    DIdn't they teach you "critical thinking" at school, or at least in College? Were you too busy drawing ugly little Niros to listen?

    • See 1 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Jul 10, 2023

      One comment half the length of this one could easily have conveyed the few useful bits of information in the four (4) separate comments you've left on this story.


  • Cprescott Cprescott on Jul 10, 2023

    Unless a dependable golf cart can be had for under $30k without having to steal your neighbor's $7,500, then there is no point in owning a golf cart (unless you use it on a golf course).

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next