Rare Rides: The 1954 Woodill Wildfire-Buick, Fiberglass and Fun-sized

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride was formerly unknown to your author. A brief boutique brand in the Fifties, Woodill went away long before most of you were even born. Let’s see if we can learn a bit more about this American take on the classic British roadster formula.

In the early Fifties, fiberglass started its spread across America as an easily workable, affordable material for use in the construction of sporty car bodies. The first of this new kind of sports car to enter production was the Glasspar G2, produced by Bill Tritt (a yacht maker) in 1949. In those days such roadsters were not offered by the major OEMs in Detroit, which opened a path for smaller shed-built, or “boutique” if you prefer, cars.

In short order, car dealers entered into small-scale production of their own takes on the idea created by the G2. That’s where Woodill entered the picture: A successful dealer of Willys trucks in California, he imagined his own G2-type vehicle. The roadster would of course be driven by Willys parts underneath. Woodill commissioned a Glasspar-built body from Tritt, then took his idea to Willys HQ, where he was quickly shot down. At the time Willys was in merger talks with Kaiser, and the Kaiser-Darrin roadster was already well into its development.

“I’ll do it myself then,” said Woodill. Shortly thereafter, the new Woodill Wildfire was ready for sale. Available at his dealership, the Wildfire used Willys mechanicals as planned; a low-power inline-six and manual transmission. Starting in 1952, the car was available in kit form, or as a complete car built by Woodill.

The Wildfire dumped the mostly unsuitable Willys engine for a Ford V8 at some point, but by then a little fiberglass competition had arrived – the Corvette. Corvette spelled the beginning of the end for piecemeal fiberglass cars from car dealers when it was introduced in 1953, as consumers eagerly threw their dollars at General Motors. The Wildfire remained on offer through 1958, with roughly 300 produced. Of that figure, 15 were sold as complete cars, and 285 as kits.

But today’s Rare Ride is an even rarer subset of those kit cars. In 1954 a few kits were purchased by a Buick dealer in California, Harry Clark. Clark put his own (fairly extensive) Buickification on the Wildfire. The front featured ’53 Buick lamps, and a modified form of a Chevy grille from the same year. He used a more curved windshield than the standard Wildfire. Clark also grabbed the rear fender molds from a ’53 Buick, and made them in fiberglass for his roadster. And perhaps most notably to add an upscale Buick vibe, a continental kit was attached at the rear. Chrome bumpers front and rear were donated by Ford, for some reason.

Power for these few examples was GM as well, in the form of the new 322 cubic inch Nailhead V8 from Buick. It was luxuriously matched with a Dynaflow automatic transmission, with floor-mount lever.

The extensive changes turned the Wildfire into a Wildfire-Buick, its only badging the Buick crest on the steering wheel. Perhaps the only one left today, this fully restored roadster asks $67,500. The joy of explaining what it is every time you park is thrown in for free.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 14 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Oct 01, 2020

    Looks bad from the rear but still an interesting car . To bad about the DynaSquish box, you have to suffer driving one to fully grasp how awful they are . -Nate

    • See 2 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Oct 04, 2020

      @-Nate "No, the Dynaflow slush box had three ‘turbines’ in it " The triple turbine was only for 1958 and 1959.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 01, 2020

    The tail lights look like those on a 53 Buick. Looks like they reached into the parts bin for 53 Buicks.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next