2020 Subaru WRX STI Review - Aging Yet Still Fun

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2020 Subaru WRX STI Fast Facts

2.5-liter turbocharged "boxer" horizontally-opposed four-cylinder (310 horsepower @ 6,000 rpm; 290 lb-ft @ 4,000-5,200 rpm)
Six-speed manual; all-wheel drive
16 city / 22 highway / 19 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
14.3 city, 10.8 highway, 12.7 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$36,995 (U.S) / $47,895 (Canada)
As Tested
$43,959 (U.S.) / $49,999 (Canada)
Prices include $900 destination charge in the United States and $1,825 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

Most people slow down a bit, in terms of being the life of the party, as they approach their dotage. Others keep rocking straight into the retirement home.

Count the Subaru WRX STI among that latter group.

Every bit of the car reminds you that it hasn’t changed much since 2014 when the WRX split from the Impreza, yet it’s so fun to drive that you just don’t care.

Fun, though not always smooth. I’ve always thought of the WRX/WRX STI as kinda like bulldogs – a bit ugly but tough, and fun if you’re willing to put up with some roughness around the edges.

Here, that roughness manifests itself in terms of exhaust noise and a light-switch of a clutch that makes smooth engagement tricky. Sure, maybe we just don’t drive manuals enough anymore, or maybe I am just not as smooth as I’d like to be, but this Subie too often made me feel like I was a teenager learning how to master a manual again.

Once rolling, however, it becomes a moot point, since the STI remains a hoot. Acceleration is swift and cornering is nice and sharp, though with some understeer if you push hard enough.

That performance covers a lot of sins. Predictably, the STI rides really stiffly and the seats are similarly firm – those with bad backs or sensitive stomachs may want to steer clear. The cabin looks every bit of the height of 2013, with the big news for 2020 being the addition of keyless starting as standard. At least the controls are easy enough to use and laid out in a logical manner.

Then there’s the large wing, which while no doubt helpful with performance, also sends a signal to bystanders that perhaps you’re compensating for something. The loud-but-crude exhaust doesn’t help shake off the stigma, either.

To be fair to Subaru, any embarrassment at being seen piloting this thing may be a function of age. Not the platform’s, but mine – twenty-five-year-old me probably would be happier to be seen behind the wheel of this boy-racer sedan that forty-year-old me. Such is life – lots of people switch from cheap swill that’s generously labeled as beer to moderately-priced quality brown liquor as they age. Just like some sports-car buyers trade Fast and Furious-ready styling for more mature duds as they move up the pricing ladder.

Then again, this car does bring out your inner hoon, and that, of course, brings grins. If you can deal with the stares.

Available features include Brembo brakes, front and rear limited-slip differentials, 19-inch BBS wheels, summer performance tires, LED adaptive headlights, driver-controlled center differential, sport suspension, dual-zone climate control, dual USB ports, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, satellite radio, Bluetooth, keyless access and starting, heated front seats, Bilstein dampers, body-side molding, and Recaro seats.

The STI remains what it has been for years now – a brute-force fighter that doesn’t care about looking good or being comfortable. It just wants to play.

Play well it does. But the price is a bit steep. Should you be willing to pay it, you’ll have plenty of fun – even as aged as this STI is.

What’s New for 2020

Keyless entry and starting, a bump in the base price of $400.

Who Should Buy It

Performance enthusiasts who are willing to sacrifice comfort and style for fun.

[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on May 20, 2021

    The base WRX holds some appeal to me in a value/performance/stealth/manual (base - no wing) sort of way. Just have the dealer add the tweeter option to the base stereo. If the next gen keeps the manual trans and the not-fuel economy-focused AWD, it will stay on my radar.

  • Stuki Stuki on May 20, 2021

    On a car like this, I'd keep the wing. It's not harming anything, and it's not that impossible to find stretches of road fast enough to make it useful when you have 300hp in a fairly small car. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the wing makes sense before the suspension stiffness, in terms of speed.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next