Junkyard Find: 1964 Volvo PV544 Sport

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

When I’m searching car graveyards for interesting examples of automotive history, discarded rear-wheel-drive Volvos from the Swedish Brick era (roughly 1967 through 1998) have been easy enough to find over the last decade. Yes, 140s, 200s, 700s, 900s— I’ve been able to document each type. Even the pre-brick Amazon isn’t so hard to find in the big American UWrenchIt yards. But the Amazon’s ancestor, the PV444/544, that’s a rare Junkyard Find, even though Americans could buy the PV544 through 1966.

In 2016, I found this gutted basket-case of a PV544 at a Denver yard back when I was grabbing car-parts-boombox bits at the All You Can Carry Sale. There wasn’t much left of it, though I yanked some door-latch hardware for a friend’s LZ9-swapped PV544 race car and some switches for future junkyard boomboxes. At the time, this car just seemed too wretched and stripped to be worth photographing for this series, so I let it go to The Crusher without getting more than a couple of quick snaps. Then, last year, I found and documented a reasonably complete 1959 PV544 Sport.

That had been it for my junkyard PV544 documentation efforts (though I have managed to shoot a junked 1930s PV802… in the woods of northern Sweden), so when I found this ’64 PV544 Sport in a Silicon Valley boneyard in June, I decided to break out my camera despite the lack of an engine.

That engine would have been the hot-rod B18, a pushrod four-banger that first appeared in 1961. In 1964, the B18 made 90 optimistic gross horses. The early 140s also got B18s, prior to the advent of the bored-out B20.

The interior was mostly gone as well, suggesting either a discarded parts car or a junkyard inmate picked clean by voracious parts shoppers. The San Francisco Bay Area is a real hotbed of old-Volvo activity, so the word about this car would have spread quickly once it showed up on the radar.

I think all PV544s sold in the United States were the once-exclusive Sport models by the middle 1960s, but further research may be needed.

The fenders, doors, and glass looked to be worth rescuing, and maybe someone has done so by now.

So classy, so romantic! Note that the 544s in these ads are driving on the left, this being prior to Högertrafikomläggningen.

The PV444 was designed while World War II was still underway, and it had a modern-for-the-time overhead-valve engine and unibody construction.

For links to 2,100+ additional Junkyard Finds, be sure to visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next