The New Audi A3 Comes with Subscription Fees in Europe

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

European-market cars are a great way to see what some of America’s favorite luxury brands have in store for the New Continent, but the Euro updates don’t always make their way here. One we’re hoping skips North America is Audi’s new subscription scheme, recently introduced with the new A3 in Europe. We’ll see the new car in 2025, but let’s keep our fingers crossed this change stays out of North America.


Audi is charging buyers subscription fees to access features like adaptive cruise control, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, automatic high beams, and, bafflingly, dual-zone climate controls. This is all running on carryover electronics from 2023, which include a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster and a 10.1-inch touchscreen.


Paying the fee opens access to Audi’s app store, which is where users can download CarPlay and other features. Though we don’t know how much Audi plans to charge, the automaker offers three- and six-month options, as well as one- and three-year subscriptions. Owners can also buy the features outright.


The Euro A3 Sportback, which we likely won’t get, starts at around $39,000 at today’s conversion rates. The sedan is almost $900 more, while the crossover-like A3 Allstreet, also probably not destined for our shores, starts at around $41,000.


Audi must think its buyers will react differently from BMW’s. Its customers, the media, and people who’d never even seen a car before all became irate after learning that they’d be charged extra for similar features, causing the automaker to walk back its plans to charge extra. European car buyers might be more polite than Americans, but it’s hard to imagine anyone being excited about not fully owning the car they’ve already paid for.


[Image: Audi]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Matzel Matzel on Mar 18, 2024

    Hard pass on subscriptions for already installed hardware on vehicles. I understand charging for remote start and such when the manufacturer has actual costs for the LTE signal to communicate with the vehicle. But subscriptions for dual climate control? 🤣 Phat chance.

  • Joe Joe on Mar 20, 2024

    if I out right own the car I also own all the equipment in the car so it better work. Now if I’m leasing the car and you want to rent me features I guess I would have to deal with that. This will ultimately be a fail once we start hacking the computer to turn on the features.

    consumers are becoming tired of subscriptions… see “stream fatigue”

  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
Next