Volvo Revives Subscription Scheme for California

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Volvo Cars is reintroducing its subscription model in California, despite having previously gotten in trouble for violating the state's franchise laws. While the automotive industry has attempted to hype the premise for years, vehicle subscription services haven't gotten much love from consumers and tend to exist in a legal gray zone that makes regulators uneasy. We even bashed them years ago for being one of the most expensive ways to get into an automobile, with only a modicum of features to help rationalize the added expenditure.


Early versions of subscription plans functioned like a lease, allowing customers to pay a premium to swap between models. It was effectively like having a permanent rental vehicle that the manufacturer would be willing to exchange once certain conditions were met. Often presented as a luxury service, the logistics of managing such an endeavor turned out to be a real problem for most brands. A lot of these services weren’t profitable and customers were already scrunching their faces at the premise of opting into a more expensive lease with some curious perks about limited vehicle swapping.


This encouraged most manufacturers to abandon their subscription schemes within the last four years. Despite often being touted as luxury experiences (e.g. “Book by Cadillac” and the “Mercedes-Benz Collection”), there simply wasn’t enough interest for the concept to stick around. While German brands have attempted to pivot toward “selling” individual features via subscription – effectively charging customers to rent hardware that’s already been equipped to their vehicles – almost everyone else just trashed the idea.


Volvo is the exception – not that it hasn’t faced challenges of its own.


In 2019, the California New Car Dealers Association complained to the state’s New Motor Vehicle Board that “ Care by Volvo” basically allowed the automaker to circumvent dealerships by allowing customers to order cars directly online. Later that year, the Department of Motor Vehicles launched an investigation and determined that Volvo was deceptively masking leases as subscription services by 2020. The DMV basically said Volvo had to stop what it was doing and had failed to provide adequate information for both dealers and customers.


However, Automotive News recently quoted corporate leadership as saying it’s wholly committed to its subscription program and has even found its way back into California.


"Giving customers the freedom to move in a personal, sustainable and safe way is our mission," Volvo Car’s outgoing CEO (for our market) Anders Gustafsson told the outlet. "Working with our retailer partners to offer the flexibility to do so is one way we are fulfilling our mission."


The rebooted program emerged immediately after the company started taking heat from state regulators and is more in line with what German manufacturers were offering when subscription schemes first started being floated as an idea. It ups the number of eligible models and allows retailers to offer in-stock vehicles to participating customers.


From AN:


"It became clear to us that we needed to provide more differentiation between our current subscription and a lease," Care by Volvo U.S. former chief Peter Wexler told Automotive News following the revamp. "The most natural way to do that was to introduce more flexible terms."
The revised California subscription service is similar to Volvo's program in New York: Customers can choose a vehicle from retailer stock and must secure their own insurance coverage.
Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Association, said the new Care by Volvo is "significantly different than the earlier iteration, which was found to violate California law by our DMV."
Volvo retailers are the contact point for subscription consumers and are free to price the vehicles, Maas told Automotive News. Also, Volvo won't offer a competing lease product.


"This program was designed to help us capture a new audience and introduce them to the safety, sustainability and technology benefits of driving a new Volvo car," Gustafsson said. "The flexibility and all-inclusive offer conquests customers from other brands, but our vehicles are helping keep them with us."


Volvo has said that the scheme is profitable but has decided against sharing the take rate or how much money it has raked in thus far. While that could mean there’s something to hide, it would be strange for Volvo to stick with the plan if it were an utter failure. Based on how other subscription plans have performed, it doesn’t seem like there’s a lot of hope for Care by Volvo. But the brand’s leadership has said it’s 100 percent committed to it – likely due to the claim that it's bringing in a lot of younger customers that have never tried a Volvo product before.


[Image: meowKa/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 30, 2023

    "circumvent(ing) dealerships" should be illegal.

    Does "circumventing" mean spending my money there?

  • Chris P Bacon Chris P Bacon on Jan 31, 2023

    Unfortunately the Care by Volvo website doesn't give any pricing information. Only a "Request Information" link that I'm sure feeds you to the nearest dealer and removes any pricing transparency. It might be something I'd be interested in because of the insurance. Anything that lower the cost of having a teen driver in the house is welcome.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next