2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Review – Enticing Yet Flawed

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter four-cylinder (158 horsepower @ 6,500 RPM, 138 lb-ft @ 4,200 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Continuously-variable automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
25 city / 30 highway / 27 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
9.4 city / 7.8 highway / 8.7 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$28,950 (U.S.) / $37,130 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$30,590 (U.S.) / $39, 563.50 (Canada)
Prices include $1,245 destination charge in the United States and $2,133.50 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Once upon a time, the Honda HR-V was a nice little affordable urban runabout with a cramped interior, unremarkable dynamics, and boring styling.

The 2023 Honda HR-V is a much nicer package, with a roomier, nicer cabin and styling that will get noticed – though not necessarily in a good way.


It also offers handling that actually has some verve – Honda remembered that they’re Honda – and a comfy ride. Now, let’s talk about giving that engine some more guts. And giving this crossover some better tires.

The 2.0-liter four-cylinder makes 158 horsepower and just 138 lb-ft of torque, and that’s disappointing. There’s a lack of passing punch here, and merging takes some planning. The HR-V could be a fun little urban commuter if it had, say, 200 lb-ft of torque. Maybe even 175. But there’s just not enough grunt here.

The other thing that’s lacking is rubber – the tires here give up the ghost a bit too easily when pushed, especially if the pavement is a bit wet. Yes, yes, we know – few folks are slaloming a small crossover around an autocross. But even accounting for vehicle type and use case, Honda should shoe the HR-V with grippier tires.

Especially since the handling here is good enough that you might want to have a little back-road fun, crossover or not. For reference, my test car had the available all-wheel drive system.

Credit the MacPherson strut suspension up front and rear multi-link for this. The electric power steering manages to feel actually connected to the road and not too artificial.

At least the continuously-variable automatic transmission doesn’t annoy. Most of us disdain CVTs but this is one of the better ones.

The HR-V’s interior will be familiar to anyone who has spent time in the Civic, and that’s a good thing. It looks classy, it’s functional, and everything just sort of works. There’s leg- and headroom a plenty, and the seats are comfy. The only downside is that some materials feel cheap, especially in the top-trim EX-L I drove – a vehicle that costs $30,590. Oh, wait, there’s one more downside – the tacked-on infotainment screen.

Honda gave the HR-V new styling, and it’s more than a tad polarizing, thanks to the snub-nose shape. It looks better in person than in pictures, but it’s still a bit of a puzzling choice. Similarly puzzling was the decision to not include a power tailgate – something competitors offer.

My test unit – a top-trim EX-L with all-wheel drive – had a base price of $28,950. That price included features such as leather seats, heated front seats, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, blind-spot information monitor, rear cross-traffic monitor, driver attention monitor, Bluetooth, satellite radio, USB, keyless starting, wireless phone charger, dual-zone climate control, 17-inch wheels, LED headlights and taillights, keyless entry, remote start, adaptive cruise control, collision-mitigation braking, lane-keeping assist, road-departure mitigation, and traffic-jam assist. The only option was the $395 Nordic Forest paint.

Taken as a whole, I found the HR-V to be a pretty decent choice as a small crossover – and it’s certainly a more appealing choice than it was before. It needs a bit more power, a better tire choice, and some nicer interior materials to really stand out. As for the divisive looks, well, keep in mind you don’t have to see the grille while driving.

Honda took a huge step in the right direction with this generation of the HR-V. A few tweaks and the company will have one of the stronger entries at this price point.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Tonycd Tonycd on Jul 11, 2023

    Tell me about it. I have a family member whose CR-V has been soldiering on for over 20 years now.

  • Joel Sturm Joel Sturm on Jul 20, 2023

    My 2011 CR-V continues on--like new. In all this time, with lots of kilometers, two items have "given up"--the a/c compressor and the actuator in the passenger front door. This isn't bad for a pleasurable, reliable vehicle entering its teenage years. I've owned and driven autos from GM, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, and Mercedes-Benz. My current buddy, the '11 CR-V, is by far the most reliable and most pleasurable to drive--especially in a blizzard, grin. I believe that my CR-V and I will will be "friends" well into its "twenties".

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next