2023 Jeep Cherokee Lineup Reduced, V6 Dropped

by Matt Posky

Published: January 12th, 2023

2023 jeep cherokee lineup reduced v6 dropped

Stellantis hasn't officially confirmed that the current-generation Jeep Cherokee will soon be discontinued, but it sure looks that way, and 2023 is looking like its final model year. But the successor cannot be far away, considering just how few options are left within the Cherokee lineup. For 2023, trims have been limited to Altitude Lux and Trailhawk – with engine options being limited to the 180-hp 2.4-liter inline-four and 270-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four.

That means the 3.2-liter V6 is officially gone, likely upsetting some Jeep fans. While the 2.4-liter is a serviceable engine, it doesn’t make the SUV feel particularly eager even in its most svelte configuration. The available V6 and turbocharged engines always received more praise, with the former offering linear acceleration and class-leading numbers in regard to towing for the segment. Sadly, the V6 is gone and the 2.0-liter turbo is now exclusive to the Trailhawk.

Car and Driver has reported that the Pricing now starts at $39,290 for the Altitude Lux and $42,890 for the Trailhawk, both of which come with four-wheel drive. Unfortunately, this means there are fewer bargain options available.

A base 2022 Altitude started at $31,590 for the front-wheel-drive model, with the 4x4 still retailing for $6,200 less than the current Altitude Lux – though that Lux suffix does mean you’re getting more standard content (e.g. leather seats, heated steering wheel, remote start). The Trailhawk also received a $3,750 bump over last year and has traded in the default V6 for the 2.0-liter turbo.

While this may appeal to customers concerned with fuel savings, the V6 has typically been the motor getting the most love from reviewers by offering smooth, strong acceleration and decent towing capacity (with the Trailer-Tow Group Package). The 2.0-liter turbo technically offers better performance by yielding 270 horsepower and 295 lb-ft (56 lb-ft more than the V6) and improved fuel economy. But customers are losing out on some towing might. Though, if that’s a big concern, there are probably better options to consider.

Odds are good the next-gen model is just over the horizon. Stellantis has already confirmed that the Belvidere, Illinois, assembly plant (responsible for the Cherokee) will be idled at the end of February. While production is supposed to continue through then, it’s unclear whether or not the facility will be retooled for next-gen models. Car and Driver suggested manufacturing could move to Mexico, potentially shortening turnaround.

Stellantis hasn’t confirmed anything. However, the United Auto Workers (UAW) union shop chair Local 1268 already disclosed to Reuters that company documents indicated that Cherokee production will relocate from Illinois to a factory in Toluca, Mexico.

[Image: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Jeep #Cherokee #Trailhawk #FactoryNews #ProductPlanning #Stellantis

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 22 comments

ToolGuy on Jan 13, 2023

I'm probably too late to help with designing the next gen. But if you give it the fuel economy of a truck and make it super-cramped inside, it will probably sell really well in the U.S. market.

Like Reply
Redapple2 on Jan 13, 2023

Moving from ILL to MEX. Imagine the savings. Brutal regs and taxes in ILL.

Like Reply
- Tonycd on Jan 17, 2023
  
  Government services require taxes. I wouldn't want to live in Mexico under its government, would you? As for "brutal taxes," Illinois' richest man, multibillionaire Ken Griffin, pumped $50 million of his own cash into a successful crusade to defeat a lower income tax for most Illinoisans and a higher rate for the rich. Then he moved to Florida anyway.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.